Hi Stephen,
Same drill
On Mon, 2014-09-15 at 13:33 -0700, Stephen Balukoff wrote:
> Hi Brandon!
>
>
> My responses in-line:
>
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Brandon Logan
> wrote:
> IN IRC the topic came up about supporting many-to-many load
> balancers to
> ampho
e questions)"
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Date: Monday, September 15, 2014 1:33 PM
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Octavia] Responsibilities for cont
Hi Brandon!
My responses in-line:
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Brandon Logan wrote:
> IN IRC the topic came up about supporting many-to-many load balancers to
> amphorae. I believe a consensus was made that allowing only one-to-many
> load balancers to amphorae would be the first step for
IN IRC the topic came up about supporting many-to-many load balancers to
amphorae. I believe a consensus was made that allowing only one-to-many
load balancers to amphorae would be the first step forward, and
re-evaluate later, since colocation and apolocation will need to work
(which brings up an
