On Tue, 2014-03-04 at 10:11 +0100, Luke Gorrie wrote:
> On 3 March 2014 18:30, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> My advice was therefore that you should not wait for that to
> happen to
>
> engage in cooperative behavior, because you don't want to be
> the first
>
On 4 March 2014 11:40, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> This is a technical requirement, and failing to match those requirements
> is clearly not the same as engaging in deception or otherwise failing
> the OpenStack community code of conduct.
>
Thank you for clearing that up!
___
Luke Gorrie wrote:
> "Cooperative behavior" is vague.
I realize I was way too vague and apologize if you felt threatened in
any way. It is terminology borrowed from sociology, and I realize it
does not translate that well in general discussion (and appears stronger
than I really meant).
> Case in
On 3 March 2014 18:30, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> My advice was therefore that you should not wait for that to happen to
> engage in cooperative behavior, because you don't want to be the first
> company to get singled out.
>
"Cooperative behavior" is vague.
Case in point: I have not successfully
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Luke Gorrie wrote:
> > That's a really harsh threat being made against a really vaguely defined
> > group.
> >
> > I don't want to have to read between the lines on threats posted to
> > openstack-dev to see if my reputation will be in tatte
Luke Gorrie wrote:
> That's a really harsh threat being made against a really vaguely defined
> group.
>
> I don't want to have to read between the lines on threats posted to
> openstack-dev to see if my reputation will be in tatters in the morning.
>
> This spoiled my day today, and I have nothi
On 3 March 2014 11:27, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> It will certainly hurt the first one we nail on the wall. So here is one
> reputational pressure: you don't want to be that company.
>
> [1] http://fnords.wordpress.com/2014/02/24/the-dilemma-of-open-innovation/
-1.
That's a really harsh threat be
+1
Sent with AquaMail for Android
http://www.aqua-mail.com
On March 3, 2014 10:12:43 AM Jay Pipes wrote:
On Sat, 2014-03-01 at 16:30 -0700, John Griffith wrote:
> Hey,
> I just wanted to send out a quick note on a topic that came up
> recently. Unfortunately the folks that I'd like to read
On Sat, 2014-03-01 at 16:30 -0700, John Griffith wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I just wanted to send out a quick note on a topic that came up
> recently. Unfortunately the folks that I'd like to read this most;
> don't participate on the ML typically, but I'd at least like to raise
> some community awareness
Sean Dague wrote:
> On 03/01/2014 06:30 PM, John Griffith wrote:
>> Something that came up recently in the Cinder project is that one of the
>> backend device vendors wasn't happy with a feature that somebody was
>> working on and contributed a patch for. Instead of providing a
>> meaningful revie
On Sat, 1 Mar 2014 16:30:10 -0700
John Griffith wrote:
> I don't want to go into detail about who, what, where etc at this
> point. I instead, I want to point out that in my opinion this is no
> way to operate in an Open Source community. Collaboration is one
> thing, but ambushing other peoples
On 03/01/2014 08:45 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
> On 03/01/2014 03:30 PM, John Griffith wrote:
>> Hey,
>>
>> I just wanted to send out a quick note on a topic that came up recently.
>> Unfortunately the folks that I'd like to read this most; don't
>> participate on the ML typically, but I'd at least
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 6:30 PM, John Griffith
wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I just wanted to send out a quick note on a topic that came up recently.
> Unfortunately the folks that I'd like to read this most; don't participate
> on the ML typically, but I'd at least like to raise some community
> awareness.
>
On 03/02/2014 07:10 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 03/01/2014 06:30 PM, John Griffith wrote:
>> Hey,
>>
>> I just wanted to send out a quick note on a topic that came up
>> recently. Unfortunately the folks that I'd like to read this
>> most; don't participate on the ML typically, but I'd at least
>>
On 03/01/2014 06:30 PM, John Griffith wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I just wanted to send out a quick note on a topic that came up recently.
> Unfortunately the folks that I'd like to read this most; don't
> participate on the ML typically, but I'd at least like to raise some
> community awareness.
>
> We a
On 2 March 2014 12:30, John Griffith wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I just wanted to send out a quick note on a topic that came up recently.
> Unfortunately the folks that I'd like to read this most; don't participate
> on the ML typically, but I'd at least like to raise some community
> awareness.
Thank you.
+hellyeah
On Mar 1, 2014 7:45 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
>
> On 03/01/2014 03:30 PM, John Griffith wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > I just wanted to send out a quick note on a topic that came up recently.
> > Unfortunately the folks that I'd like to read this most; don't
> > participate on the ML typi
On 03/01/2014 03:30 PM, John Griffith wrote:
Hey,
I just wanted to send out a quick note on a topic that came up recently.
Unfortunately the folks that I'd like to read this most; don't
participate on the ML typically, but I'd at least like to raise some
community awareness.
We all know OpenS
Hey,
I just wanted to send out a quick note on a topic that came up recently.
Unfortunately the folks that I'd like to read this most; don't participate
on the ML typically, but I'd at least like to raise some community
awareness.
We all know OpenStack is growing at a rapid pace and has a lot of
19 matches
Mail list logo
