Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [cinder] [nova] locking concern with os-brick

2016-08-13 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 8/12/2016 8:54 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 8/12/2016 8:52 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 8/12/2016 8:24 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote: On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 05:55:47AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote: A devstack patch was pushed earlier this cycle around os-brick - https://review.openstack.org/341744 A

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [cinder] [nova] locking concern with os-brick

2016-08-13 Thread Jay Bryant
I have enough experience to know that the notes will not be read. I think we need to pull Walt and Kendall in and come up with a safer solution to this. That is my 2 cents. :-) Jay On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 5:07 PM Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 8/12/2016 8:54 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > > On 8/12/

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [cinder] [nova] locking concern with os-brick

2016-08-15 Thread Sean Dague
On 08/13/2016 06:07 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > > I checked a tempest-dsvm CI run upstream and we don't follow this > recommendation for our own CI on all changes in OpenStack, so before we > make this note in the release notes, I'd like to see us use the same > lock_path for c-vol and n-cpu in d