I have proposed http://forumtopics.openstack.org/cfp/details/33 and will be
present. Thanks Thierry!
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 9:48 PM, Thierry Carrez
wrote:
> Erik McCormick wrote:
> > [...]
> > Also, if you'd like to discuss this in detail with a room full of
> > bodies, I suggest proposing a se
Thanks Thierry, not sure if I can make the trip, but will have a try :)
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 9:48 PM, Thierry Carrez
wrote:
> Erik McCormick wrote:
> > [...]
> > Also, if you'd like to discuss this in detail with a room full of
> > bodies, I suggest proposing a session for the Forum in Sydney
Erik McCormick wrote:
> [...]
> Also, if you'd like to discuss this in detail with a room full of
> bodies, I suggest proposing a session for the Forum in Sydney. If some
> of the contributors will be there, it would be a good opportunity for
> you to get feedback.
Yes, "Bare metal as a service: I
Thanks Sean for raising the concerns. We don't really fork nova but some
parts of the "ABI" of it. For the 2 API surfaces, we have different
strategies, please see explanations below:
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 10:34 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 09/27/2017 09:31 AM, Julia Kreger wrote:
> > [...]
> >>
On 09/27/2017 09:31 AM, Julia Kreger wrote:
> [...]
>>> The short explanation which clicked for me (granted it's probably an
>>> oversimplification, but still) was this: Ironic provides an admin
>>> API for managing bare metal resources, while Mogan gives you a user
>>> API (suitable for public clo
[...]
>> The short explanation which clicked for me (granted it's probably an
>> oversimplification, but still) was this: Ironic provides an admin
>> API for managing bare metal resources, while Mogan gives you a user
>> API (suitable for public cloud use cases) to your Ironic backend. I
>> suppose
On 27/09/17 01:59 +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2017-09-27 09:15:21 +0800 (+0800), Zhenguo Niu wrote:
[...]
I don't mean there are deficiencies in Ironic. Ironic itself is cool, it
works well with TripleO, Nova, Kolla, etc. Mogan just want to be another
client to schedule workloards on Ironic
On 2017-09-27 09:15:21 +0800 (+0800), Zhenguo Niu wrote:
[...]
> I don't mean there are deficiencies in Ironic. Ironic itself is cool, it
> works well with TripleO, Nova, Kolla, etc. Mogan just want to be another
> client to schedule workloards on Ironic and provide bare metal specific
> APIs for u
Thanks Erik for the response!
I don't mean there are deficiencies in Ironic. Ironic itself is cool, it
works well with TripleO, Nova, Kolla, etc. Mogan just want to be another
client to schedule workloards on Ironic and provide bare metal specific
APIs for users who seeks a way to provider virtual
My main question here would be this: If you feel there are deficiencies in
Ironic, why not contribute to improving Ironic rather than spawning a whole
new project?
I am happy to take a look at it, and I'm by no means trying to contradict
your assumptions here. I just get concerned with the overhea
10 matches
Mail list logo
