Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] Tempest Release Naming

2014-05-27 Thread Yair Fried
- Original Message - From: Sean Dague s...@dague.net To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Sent: Friday, May 23, 2014 3:40:16 AM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] Tempest Release Naming On 05/22/2014 08:33 PM, Jeremy

[openstack-dev] [QA] Tempest Release Naming

2014-05-22 Thread Matthew Treinish
Hi Everyone, So I was preparing to push the first tag as part of the move to a world with a branchless tempest and was trying to figure out the naming convention we should be using. The only complexity here is that we are targeting to do 4 releases a year that coincide with the OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] Tempest Release Naming

2014-05-22 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2014-05-22 18:33:34 -0400 (-0400), Matthew Treinish wrote: [...] I'd like to stick with one scheme and not decide to change it later on. I figured I should bring this out to a wider audience to see if there were other suggestions or opinions before I pushed out the tag, especially because

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] Tempest Release Naming

2014-05-22 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2014-05-22 20:40:16 -0400 (-0400), Sean Dague wrote: Given that we're not really going to have major / minor bumps at this point (more a continous roll), I might argue that we should just go Firefox on it and bump the integer on every release. [...] Marvellously pragmatic. If you need minor

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] Tempest Release Naming

2014-05-22 Thread Matthew Treinish
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 01:01:42AM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2014-05-22 20:40:16 -0400 (-0400), Sean Dague wrote: Given that we're not really going to have major / minor bumps at this point (more a continous roll), I might argue that we should just go Firefox on it and bump the