I did some streamlining of the etherpad on this:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/MinimalCLI
I agree that required arguments should be positional. The only one that is
confusing is the --repo argument to the app create command, which will end up
being optional in a subsequent release, so I want
On 12/03/2013 11:45 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> On 12/03/2013 11:39 AM, Arati Mahimane wrote:
>> Randall, I think you are talking about required parameters and we are
>> talking about optional ones.
>> Please correct me if I am wrong.
>
> Russell was specifically talking about required parameters being
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 10:09 PM, Adrian Otto wrote:
> Sorry, I changed the link. We originally started with hyphenated
> noun-verbs but switched to the current proposal upon receipt of advice that
> it would be more compatible with the next version of the cliff based CLI
> for OpenStack. If I rem
On 12/03/2013 11:39 AM, Arati Mahimane wrote:
Randall, I think you are talking about required parameters and we are
talking about optional ones.
Please correct me if I am wrong.
Russell was specifically talking about required parameters being
positional arguments.
Best,
-jay
__
t;>
>>>>
>>>>> -Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Russell Bryant [mailto:rbry...@redhat.com]
>>>>> Sent: Monday, December 02, 2013 8:17 PM
>>>>> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
>>>>> Subject: Re
;>wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> -Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Russell Bryant [mailto:rbry...@redhat.com]
>>>>> Sent: Monday, December 02, 2013 8:17 PM
>>>>> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
>>
n Agrawal" wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: Russell Bryant [mailto:rbry...@redhat.com]
>>>> Sent: Monday, December 02, 2013 8:17 PM
>>>> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
>>>> Sub
; -Original Message-
>>> From: Russell Bryant [mailto:rbry...@redhat.com]
>>> Sent: Monday, December 02, 2013 8:17 PM
>>> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
>>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] CLI minimal implementation
>>>
>>> O
On 12/3/13 7:51 AM, "Roshan Agrawal" wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Russell Bryant [mailto:rbry...@redhat.com]
>> Sent: Monday, December 02, 2013 8:17 PM
>> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [
> -Original Message-
> From: Russell Bryant [mailto:rbry...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Monday, December 02, 2013 8:17 PM
> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] CLI minimal implementation
>
> On 12/02/2013 07:03 PM, Roshan Agra
.
--
Adrian
PS: Sorry for top posting. This mail reader offers me no choice.
Original message
From: Russell Bryant
Date:12/02/2013 6:23 PM (GMT-08:00)
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] CLI minimal implementation
On 12/02/2013 07:03 PM, Roshan
On 12/02/2013 07:03 PM, Roshan Agrawal wrote:
> I have created a child blueprint to define scope for the minimal
> implementation of the CLI to consider for milestone 1.
> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/solum/+spec/cli-minimal-implementation
This link doesn't work. The right one is:
https://b
On 12/02/2013 07:03 PM, Roshan Agrawal wrote:
> I have created a child blueprint to define scope for the minimal
> implementation of the CLI to consider for milestone 1.
> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/solum/+spec/cli-minimal-implementation
>
> Spec for the minimal CLI @
> https://wiki.openst
I have created a child blueprint to define scope for the minimal implementation
of the CLI to consider for milestone 1.
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/solum/+spec/cli-minimal-implementation
Spec for the minimal CLI @
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Solum/FeatureBlueprints/CLI-minimal-implement
14 matches
Mail list logo
