On 13 August 2015 at 09:50, John Garbutt wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 12, 2015, Thierry Carrez
> wrote:
>
>> Gary Kotton wrote:
>> >
>> > On 8/12/15, 12:12 AM, "Mike Perez" wrote:
>> >> On 15:39 Aug 11, Gary Kotton wrote:
>> >>> On 8/11/15, 6:09 PM, "Jay Pipes" wrote:
>> >>>
>> Are you s
On Wednesday, August 12, 2015, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Gary Kotton wrote:
> >
> > On 8/12/15, 12:12 AM, "Mike Perez" >
> wrote:
> >> On 15:39 Aug 11, Gary Kotton wrote:
> >>> On 8/11/15, 6:09 PM, "Jay Pipes" >
> wrote:
> >>>
> Are you saying that *new functionality* was added to the stable/k
Apologies to go back in time in the tread, but I wanted to share some
extra context...
On 10 August 2015 at 16:17, Gary Kotton wrote:
> I agree that the sub team(s) need to review more.
>
> The question is how do the team member feel like they are making progress?
> That is, do they see patches
>
Gary Kotton wrote:
>
> On 8/12/15, 12:12 AM, "Mike Perez" wrote:
>> On 15:39 Aug 11, Gary Kotton wrote:
>>> On 8/11/15, 6:09 PM, "Jay Pipes" wrote:
>>>
Are you saying that *new functionality* was added to the stable/kilo
branch of *Neutron*, and because new functionality was added to
>
On 8/12/15, 12:12 AM, "Mike Perez" wrote:
>On 15:39 Aug 11, Gary Kotton wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 8/11/15, 6:09 PM, "Jay Pipes" wrote:
>>
>> >Are you saying that *new functionality* was added to the stable/kilo
>> >branch of *Neutron*, and because new functionality was added to
>> >stable/kilo's Ne
On 15:39 Aug 11, Gary Kotton wrote:
>
>
> On 8/11/15, 6:09 PM, "Jay Pipes" wrote:
>
> >Are you saying that *new functionality* was added to the stable/kilo
> >branch of *Neutron*, and because new functionality was added to
> >stable/kilo's Neutron, that stable/kilo *Nova* will no longer work?
>
On 08/11/2015 11:39 AM, Gary Kotton wrote:
On 8/11/15, 6:09 PM, "Jay Pipes" wrote:
Are you saying that *new functionality* was added to the stable/kilo
branch of *Neutron*, and because new functionality was added to
stable/kilo's Neutron, that stable/kilo *Nova* will no longer work?
Yes. That
On 8/11/15, 6:09 PM, "Jay Pipes" wrote:
>On 08/11/2015 10:57 AM, Gary Kotton wrote:
>> On 8/11/15, 5:08 PM, "Jeremy Stanley" wrote:
>>
>>> On 2015-08-11 13:49:37 + (+), Gary Kotton wrote:
This is a stable issue - please see
https://review.openstack.org/165750.
This is req
On 08/11/2015 10:57 AM, Gary Kotton wrote:
On 8/11/15, 5:08 PM, "Jeremy Stanley" wrote:
On 2015-08-11 13:49:37 + (+), Gary Kotton wrote:
This is a stable issue - please see https://review.openstack.org/165750.
This is required to support the plugin developed in Liberty.
[...]
I'm st
On 8/11/15, 5:08 PM, "Jeremy Stanley" wrote:
>On 2015-08-11 13:49:37 + (+), Gary Kotton wrote:
>> This is a stable issue - please see https://review.openstack.org/165750.
>> This is required to support the plugin developed in Liberty.
>[...]
>
>I'm still missing the connection to stable
On 2015-08-11 13:49:37 + (+), Gary Kotton wrote:
> This is a stable issue - please see https://review.openstack.org/165750.
> This is required to support the plugin developed in Liberty.
[...]
I'm still missing the connection to stable. That review is targeting
master (liberty). Stable cur
e.com]
>> Sent: Monday, August 10, 2015 4:18 PM
>> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Stable][Nova] VMware NSXv Support
>>
>>
>>
>> On 8/10/15, 6:05 PM, "Gary Kotton" wrote:
>>
>> >
>> &g
> -Original Message-
> From: Gary Kotton [mailto:gkot...@vmware.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 10, 2015 4:18 PM
> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Stable][Nova] VMware NSXv Support
>
>
>
> On 8/10/15, 6:05 PM, "Gary Kotto
the last say is on stable-maint-core, but normally new
>>>>>> features are really no-no to stable branches.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My concerns are more on the metadata side of your changes.
>>>&
-core, but normally new
>>>>> features are really no-no to stable branches.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> My concerns are more on the metadata side of your changes.
>>>>>
>>>>> Even the refactoring is fairly cle
t is major part of the
>>>> metadata handler.
>>>>
>>>> It also changes the API (In the case of X-Metadata-Provider being
>>>> present) which tends to be sacred on stable branches.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The chan
5, 2015 8:03 AM *To:* OpenStack List *Subject:*
[openstack-dev] [Stable][Nova] VMware NSXv Support
Hi,
In the Kilo cycle a Neutron driver was added for supporting the
Vmware NSXv plugin. This required patches in Nova to enable the
plugin to work with Nova. These patches finally landed yesterd
the refactoring is fairly clean it is major part of the
>>> metadata handler.
>>>
>>> It also changes the API (In the case of X-Metadata-Provider being
>>> present) which tends to be sacred on stable branches.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>&
es here does not actually fix any bug but just implements
>> new functionality that missed kilo not even slightly but by months.
>> Thus my -1 for merging these.
>>
>>
>>
>> - Erno
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:*Gary Kotton [mailto
>
>
> *From:*Gary Kotton [mailto:gkot...@vmware.com] *Sent:* Wednesday,
> August 05, 2015 8:03 AM *To:* OpenStack List *Subject:*
> [openstack-dev] [Stable][Nova] VMware NSXv Support
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> In the Kilo cycle a Neutron driver was added for sup
, 2015 8:03 AM
To: OpenStack List
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Stable][Nova] VMware NSXv Support
Hi,
In the Kilo cycle a Neutron driver was added for supporting the Vmware NSXv
plugin. This required patches in Nova to enable the plugin to work with Nova.
These patches finally landed yesterday. I hav
: [openstack-dev] [Stable][Nova] VMware NSXv Support
Hi,
In the Kilo cycle a Neutron driver was added for supporting the Vmware NSXv
plugin. This required patches in Nova to enable the plugin to work with Nova.
These patches finally landed yesterday. I have back ported them to stable/kilo
as the
Hi,
In the Kilo cycle a Neutron driver was added for supporting the Vmware NSXv
plugin. This required patches in Nova to enable the plugin to work with Nova.
These patches finally landed yesterday. I have back ported them to stable/kilo
as the Neutron driver is unable to work without these in st
23 matches
Mail list logo
