On 22 February 2014 05:36, Derek Higgins der...@redhat.com wrote:
the ci cloud seems to be running today as expected, but we have a bit to
tuning todo
check-tripleo-overcloud-precise is throwing out false negatives because
the testenv-worker has a timeout that is less then the timeout on the
On 21/02/14 03:31, Robert Collins wrote:
On 18 February 2014 04:30, Derek Higgins der...@redhat.com wrote:
On 17/02/14 01:25, Robert Collins wrote:
Hi!
The nascent tripleo-gate is now running on all tripleo repositories,
*and should pass*, but are not yet voting. They aren't voting because
On 18 February 2014 04:30, Derek Higgins der...@redhat.com wrote:
On 17/02/14 01:25, Robert Collins wrote:
Hi!
The nascent tripleo-gate is now running on all tripleo repositories,
*and should pass*, but are not yet voting. They aren't voting because
we cannot submit to the gate unless
On 17/02/14 01:25, Robert Collins wrote:
Hi!
The nascent tripleo-gate is now running on all tripleo repositories,
*and should pass*, but are not yet voting. They aren't voting because
we cannot submit to the gate unless jenkins votes verified... *and* we
have no redundancy for the
Hi!
The nascent tripleo-gate is now running on all tripleo repositories,
*and should pass*, but are not yet voting. They aren't voting because
we cannot submit to the gate unless jenkins votes verified... *and* we
have no redundancy for the tripleo-ci cloud now, so any glitch in the
current
