Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][reviews] We're falling behind

2014-03-27 Thread Tomas Sedovic
On 25/03/14 21:17, Robert Collins wrote: > TripleO has just seen an influx of new contributors. \o/. Flip side - > we're now slipping on reviews /o\. > > In the meeting today we had basically two answers: more cores, and > more work by cores. > > We're slipping by 2 reviews a day, which given 16

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][reviews] We're falling behind

2014-03-26 Thread Derek Higgins
On 25/03/14 20:17, Robert Collins wrote: > TripleO has just seen an influx of new contributors. \o/. Flip side - > we're now slipping on reviews /o\. > > In the meeting today we had basically two answers: more cores, and > more work by cores. > > We're slipping by 2 reviews a day, which given 16

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][reviews] We're falling behind

2014-03-26 Thread mar...@redhat.com
On 26/03/14 11:50, Ladislav Smola wrote: > On 03/25/2014 09:17 PM, Robert Collins wrote: >> TripleO has just seen an influx of new contributors. \o/. Flip side - >> we're now slipping on reviews /o\. >> >> In the meeting today we had basically two answers: more cores, and >> more work by cores. >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][reviews] We're falling behind

2014-03-26 Thread Ladislav Smola
On 03/25/2014 09:17 PM, Robert Collins wrote: TripleO has just seen an influx of new contributors. \o/. Flip side - we're now slipping on reviews /o\. In the meeting today we had basically two answers: more cores, and more work by cores. We're slipping by 2 reviews a day, which given 16 cores i

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][reviews] We're falling behind

2014-03-26 Thread Jan Provazník
On 03/25/2014 09:17 PM, Robert Collins wrote: TripleO has just seen an influx of new contributors. \o/. Flip side - we're now slipping on reviews /o\. In the meeting today we had basically two answers: more cores, and more work by cores. We're slipping by 2 reviews a day, which given 16 cores i

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][reviews] We're falling behind

2014-03-25 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2014-03-25 13:17:29 -0700: > TripleO has just seen an influx of new contributors. \o/. Flip side - > we're now slipping on reviews /o\. > > In the meeting today we had basically two answers: more cores, and > more work by cores. > > We're slipping by 2 re

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][reviews] We're falling behind

2014-03-25 Thread Chris Jones
Hey +1 3 a day seems pretty sustainable. Cheers, -- Chris Jones > On 25 Mar 2014, at 20:17, Robert Collins wrote: > > TripleO has just seen an influx of new contributors. \o/. Flip side - > we're now slipping on reviews /o\. > > In the meeting today we had basically two answers: more cores,

[openstack-dev] [TripleO][reviews] We're falling behind

2014-03-25 Thread Robert Collins
TripleO has just seen an influx of new contributors. \o/. Flip side - we're now slipping on reviews /o\. In the meeting today we had basically two answers: more cores, and more work by cores. We're slipping by 2 reviews a day, which given 16 cores is a small amount. I'm going to propose some cha