On 11/09/2015 03:51 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
Hi folks!
I spent some time thinking about bringing profile matching back in, so
I'd like to get your comments on the following near-future plan.
First, the scope of the problem. What we do is essentially kind of
capability discovery. We'll help nov
On 11/09/2015 03:51 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
Hi folks!
I spent some time thinking about bringing profile matching back in, so
I'd like to get your comments on the following near-future plan.
First, the scope of the problem. What we do is essentially kind of
capability discovery. We'll help nov
On 12/02/2015 03:59 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
> On 12/01/2015 06:55 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
>> Sorry for not getting to this earlier. Some thoughts inline.
>>
>> On 11/09/2015 08:51 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
>>> Hi folks!
>>>
>>> I spent some time thinking about bringing profile matching back in, so
On 12/01/2015 06:55 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
Sorry for not getting to this earlier. Some thoughts inline.
On 11/09/2015 08:51 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
Hi folks!
I spent some time thinking about bringing profile matching back in, so
I'd like to get your comments on the following near-future plan.
Sorry for not getting to this earlier. Some thoughts inline.
On 11/09/2015 08:51 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
> Hi folks!
>
> I spent some time thinking about bringing profile matching back in, so
> I'd like to get your comments on the following near-future plan.
>
> First, the scope of the probl
On 11/09/2015 03:51 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
Hi folks!
I spent some time thinking about bringing profile matching back in, so
I'd like to get your comments on the following near-future plan.
First, the scope of the problem. What we do is essentially kind of
capability discovery. We'll help nov
In general, I think this is a good idea. Rather than putting the logic
for this in tripleoclient, it would be better to put it in
tripleo-common. Then the --assign-profiles just calls the function
imported from tripleo-common. This way the GUI could consume the same logic.
On 11/09/2015 09:51 AM,
Hi folks!
I spent some time thinking about bringing profile matching back in, so
I'd like to get your comments on the following near-future plan.
First, the scope of the problem. What we do is essentially kind of
capability discovery. We'll help nova scheduler with doing the right
thing by a
