On Wed, 2015-01-07 at 10:51 +, Derek Higgins wrote:
Hi All,
I intended to bring this up at this mornings meeting but the train I
was on had no power sockets (and I had no battery) so sending to the
list instead.
We currently run our CI with on images built for i386, we took this
On 01/08/2015 10:22 AM, Derek Higgins wrote:
On 07/01/15 23:41, Ben Nemec wrote:
I don't feel like we've been all that capacity constrained lately
anyway, so as I said in my other (largely unnecessary, as it turns out)
email, I'm +1 on doing this.
Correct we're not currently constrained on
On 07/01/15 23:41, Ben Nemec wrote:
On 01/07/2015 11:29 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Derek Higgins's message of 2015-01-07 02:51:41 -0800:
Hi All,
I intended to bring this up at this mornings meeting but the train I
was on had no power sockets (and I had no battery) so sending to
Hi All,
I intended to bring this up at this mornings meeting but the train I
was on had no power sockets (and I had no battery) so sending to the
list instead.
We currently run our CI with on images built for i386, we took this
decision a while back to save memory ( at the time is allowed us
On 01/07/2015 11:29 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Derek Higgins's message of 2015-01-07 02:51:41 -0800:
Hi All,
I intended to bring this up at this mornings meeting but the train I
was on had no power sockets (and I had no battery) so sending to the
list instead.
We currently run
+1 to all of this.
On 01/07/2015 04:51 AM, Derek Higgins wrote:
Hi All,
I intended to bring this up at this mornings meeting but the train I
was on had no power sockets (and I had no battery) so sending to the
list instead.
We currently run our CI with on images built for i386, we took
Excerpts from Derek Higgins's message of 2015-01-07 02:51:41 -0800:
Hi All,
I intended to bring this up at this mornings meeting but the train I
was on had no power sockets (and I had no battery) so sending to the
list instead.
We currently run our CI with on images built for i386, we
