On Dec 16, 2014, at 7:42 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> Signed PGP part
> On 16/12/14 12:52, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> >
> > On Dec 16, 2014, at 5:22 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Signed PGP part On 15/12/14 17:22, Doug Wiegley wrote:
> >>> Hi Ihar,
> >>>
> >>> I’m actually in favor of opt
On 12/16/14, 2:41 PM, "Doug Hellmann" wrote:
>
>On Dec 16, 2014, at 7:27 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
>
>> Signed PGP part
>> On 16/12/14 12:50, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>> >
>> > On Dec 16, 2014, at 5:13 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> Signed PGP part On 15/12/14 18:57, Doug Hellmann wr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 16/12/14 13:41, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>
> On Dec 16, 2014, at 7:27 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka
> wrote:
>
>> Signed PGP part On 16/12/14 12:50, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>>>
>>> On Dec 16, 2014, at 5:13 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka
>>> wrote:
>>>
Signed PGP p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 16/12/14 12:52, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>
> On Dec 16, 2014, at 5:22 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka
> wrote:
>
>> Signed PGP part On 15/12/14 17:22, Doug Wiegley wrote:
>>> Hi Ihar,
>>>
>>> I’m actually in favor of option 2, but it implies a few things
>>>
On Dec 16, 2014, at 7:27 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> Signed PGP part
> On 16/12/14 12:50, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> >
> > On Dec 16, 2014, at 5:13 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Signed PGP part On 15/12/14 18:57, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> >>> There may be a similar problem managing dependen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 16/12/14 12:50, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>
> On Dec 16, 2014, at 5:13 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka
> wrote:
>
>> Signed PGP part On 15/12/14 18:57, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>>> There may be a similar problem managing dependencies on
>>> libraries that live outs
On Dec 16, 2014, at 5:22 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> Signed PGP part
> On 15/12/14 17:22, Doug Wiegley wrote:
> > Hi Ihar,
> >
> > I’m actually in favor of option 2, but it implies a few things
> > about your time, and I wanted to chat with you before presuming.
>
> I think split didn't mean m
On Dec 16, 2014, at 5:13 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> Signed PGP part
> On 15/12/14 18:57, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> > There may be a similar problem managing dependencies on libraries
> > that live outside of either tree. I assume you already decided how
> > to handle that. Are you doing the same
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 15/12/14 17:22, Doug Wiegley wrote:
> Hi Ihar,
>
> I’m actually in favor of option 2, but it implies a few things
> about your time, and I wanted to chat with you before presuming.
I think split didn't mean moving project trees under separate
go
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 15/12/14 18:57, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> There may be a similar problem managing dependencies on libraries
> that live outside of either tree. I assume you already decided how
> to handle that. Are you doing the same thing, and adding the
> requirem
There may be a similar problem managing dependencies on libraries that live
outside of either tree. I assume you already decided how to handle that. Are
you doing the same thing, and adding the requirements to neutron’s lists?
On Dec 15, 2014, at 12:16 PM, Doug Wiegley wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Ih
Option 2 works for me, thanks for figuring this out Ihar and Doug!
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Doug Wiegley
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Ihar and I discussed this on IRC, and are going forward with option 2
> unless someone has a big problem with it.
>
> Thanks,
> Doug
>
>
> On 12/15/14, 8:22 AM,
Hi all,
Ihar and I discussed this on IRC, and are going forward with option 2
unless someone has a big problem with it.
Thanks,
Doug
On 12/15/14, 8:22 AM, "Doug Wiegley" wrote:
>Hi Ihar,
>
>I’m actually in favor of option 2, but it implies a few things about your
>time, and I wanted to chat w
Hi Ihar,
I’m actually in favor of option 2, but it implies a few things about your
time, and I wanted to chat with you before presuming.
Maintenance can not involve breaking changes. At this point, the co-gate
will block it. Also, oslo graduation changes will have to be made in the
services repo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 15/12/14 15:15, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> - it's a delusion that there will be no neutron-main syncs that
> will break neutron-*aas repos ever.
OK, I've just decided to check whether my (non-native speaker)
understanding of the meaning of the word
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi all,
the question arose recently in one of reviews for neutron-*aas repos
to remove all oslo-incubator code from those repos since it's
duplicated in neutron main repo. (You can find the link to the review
at the end of the email.)
Brief hostory
16 matches
Mail list logo
