st (not for usage questions)
>> > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
>> > Subject: [openstack-dev] [all][oslo_config] Improving Config Option
>> Help Texts
>> >
>> >> Hi all,
>> >>
>> >> Based on the not yet merged spec
t Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> > Date: May 24, 2016 at 06:06:14
> > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> > Subject: [openstack-dev] [all][o
2016 at 06:06:14
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: [openstack-dev] [all][oslo_config] Improving Config Option Help
> Texts
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Based on the not yet merged spec
stions)
<openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
Subject: [openstack-dev] [all][oslo_config] Improving Config Option Help Texts
> Hi all,
>
> Based on the not yet merged spec of categorized config options [0] some
> project seems to have started improving the config option help texts.
t;openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
Subject: [openstack-dev] [all][oslo_config] Improving Config Option Help Texts
> Hi all,
>
> Based on the not yet merged spec of categorized config options [0] some
> project seems to have started improving the config option help texts. This
> is great but
Hi all,
Based on the not yet merged spec of categorized config options [0] some
project seems to have started improving the config option help texts. This
is great but I noticed scary trend on clutter to be added on these
sections. Now looking individual changes it does not look that bad at all
