Le 08/03/2016 22:22, gordon chung a écrit :
it seems like the main reason there are so many projects leveraging WSME
is because everyone is just using Ironic or Ceilometer as the starting
point for their APIs. can we officially say to all new projects who plan
on copying API logic of Ironic et al
gards,
Hongbin
-Original Message-
From: Doug Hellmann [mailto:d...@doughellmann.com]
Sent: March-08-16 10:51 AM
To: openstack-dev
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [api] Reminder: WSME is not being actively
maintained
Excerpts from Chris Dent's message of 2016-03-08 11:25:48 +:
On 03/08/2016 04:44 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
it seems like the main reason there are so many projects leveraging WSME
is because everyone is just using Ironic or Ceilometer as the starting
point for their APIs. can we officially say to all new projects who plan
on copying API logic of Ironic et a
Excerpts from gordon chung's message of 2016-03-08 21:22:11 +:
>
> On 08/03/2016 6:25 AM, Chris Dent wrote:
> >
> > Last summer Lucas Gomes and I were press ganged into becoming core on
> > WSME. Since then we've piecemeal been verifying bug fixes and generally
> > trying to keep things moving
On 08/03/2016 6:25 AM, Chris Dent wrote:
>
> Last summer Lucas Gomes and I were press ganged into becoming core on
> WSME. Since then we've piecemeal been verifying bug fixes and generally
> trying to keep things moving. However, from the beginning we both agreed
> that WSME is _not_ a web framew
Excerpts from Chris Dent's message of 2016-03-08 11:25:48 +:
>
> Last summer Lucas Gomes and I were press ganged into becoming core on
> WSME. Since then we've piecemeal been verifying bug fixes and generally
> trying to keep things moving. However, from the beginning we both agreed
> that WSM
24 instances as shown by codesearch:
http://codesearch.openstack.org/?q=%5E(wsme%7CWSME)&i=nope&files=%5E.*requirements.txt&repos=
-- Dims
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 7:41 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> Which projects in OpenStack actually use WSME at this time?
>
> Best,
> -jay
>
> On 03/08/2016 07:10 AM, C
On Tue, 8 Mar 2016, Jay Pipes wrote:
Which projects in OpenStack actually use WSME at this time?
sdague and I were just talking about this and using
codesearch.openstack.org the list is something like (but probably
not completely accurate):
aodh
blazar
ceilometer
cerberus
Which projects in OpenStack actually use WSME at this time?
Best,
-jay
On 03/08/2016 07:10 AM, Chris Dent wrote:
On Tue, 8 Mar 2016, Stéphane Bisinger wrote:
Is there an estimate of how much work/time it would take to refactor the
library to slowly satisfy those three points?
No, that is the
On Tue, 8 Mar 2016, Stéphane Bisinger wrote:
Is there an estimate of how much work/time it would take to refactor the
library to slowly satisfy those three points?
No, that is the biggest reason I'm calling it unmaintained. Neither
Lucas nor I have the time nor interest in being the people who
Is there an estimate of how much work/time it would take to refactor the
library to slowly satisfy those three points?
Also, do we already have clear ideas on where we want to get? While the
three points are clear from a general point of view, what does each of
those points really mean? Which parts
Last summer Lucas Gomes and I were press ganged into becoming core on
WSME. Since then we've piecemeal been verifying bug fixes and generally
trying to keep things moving. However, from the beginning we both agreed
that WSME is _not_ a web framework that we should be encouraging. Though
it looks
12 matches
Mail list logo
