Hello! There's been some recent progress on python3 compatibility for
core libraries that OpenStack depends on[1], and this is likely to open
the flood gates for even more python3 problems to be found and fixed.
Recently a proposal was made to make oslo.messaging start to run python3
tests[2], and
Just to be clear: you're asking specifically about the 0-10 based
impl_qpid.py driver, correct? This is the driver that is used for
the "qpid://" transport (aka rpc_backend).
I ask because I'm maintaining the AMQP 1.0 driver (transport
"amqp://") that can also be used with qpidd.
However, the A
On 4/14/2015 12:22 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Hello! There's been some recent progress on python3 compatibility for
core libraries that OpenStack depends on[1], and this is likely to open
the flood gates for even more python3 problems to be found and fixed.
Recently a proposal was made to make osl
On 04/14/2015 01:22 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Hello! There's been some recent progress on python3 compatibility for
> core libraries that OpenStack depends on[1], and this is likely to open
> the flood gates for even more python3 problems to be found and fixed.
>
> Recently a proposal was made to m
Excerpts from Matt Riedemann's message of 2015-04-14 13:13:47 -0700:
>
> On 4/14/2015 12:22 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > Hello! There's been some recent progress on python3 compatibility for
> > core libraries that OpenStack depends on[1], and this is likely to open
> > the flood gates for even more
Excerpts from Ken Giusti's message of 2015-04-14 12:54:20 -0700:
> Just to be clear: you're asking specifically about the 0-10 based
> impl_qpid.py driver, correct? This is the driver that is used for
> the "qpid://" transport (aka rpc_backend).
>
> I ask because I'm maintaining the AMQP 1.0 dri
Ken Giusti wrote:
Just to be clear: you're asking specifically about the 0-10 based
impl_qpid.py driver, correct? This is the driver that is used for
the "qpid://" transport (aka rpc_backend).
I ask because I'm maintaining the AMQP 1.0 driver (transport
"amqp://") that can also be used with qp
rdo packstack deploys rabbit these days too.
Thanks,
Kevin
From: Clint Byrum [cl...@fewbar.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 3:20 PM
To: openstack-dev
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all] QPID incompatible with python 3 and
untested in gate -- what to do
On 14/04/15 10:22 -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
Hello! There's been some recent progress on python3 compatibility for
core libraries that OpenStack depends on[1], and this is likely to open
the flood gates for even more python3 problems to be found and fixed.
Recently a proposal was made to make osl
On 2015-04-15 01:10:03 +0200 (+0200), Flavio Percoco wrote:
[...]
> I'd recommend sending this email to the ops mailing list
And I'd recommend subscribing to it... it's really quite good! He
did (twice apparently, I expect the second by mistake):
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-ope
On 14/04/15 23:18 +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2015-04-15 01:10:03 +0200 (+0200), Flavio Percoco wrote:
[...]
I'd recommend sending this email to the ops mailing list
And I'd recommend subscribing to it... it's really quite good! He
did (twice apparently, I expect the second by mistake):
h
On 04/14/2015 07:26 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
> On 14/04/15 23:18 +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
>> On 2015-04-15 01:10:03 +0200 (+0200), Flavio Percoco wrote:
>> [...]
>>> I'd recommend sending this email to the ops mailing list
>>
>> And I'd recommend subscribing to it... it's really quite good! He
On 2015-04-15 01:26:21 +0200 (+0200), Flavio Percoco wrote:
> On 14/04/15 23:18 +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> >On 2015-04-15 01:10:03 +0200 (+0200), Flavio Percoco wrote:
> >[...]
> >>I'd recommend sending this email to the ops mailing list
> >
> >And I'd recommend subscribing to it... it's really
On Tue, 14 Apr 2015, Sean Dague wrote:
It's time to be honest about the level of support that comes with those
other backends, deprecate the plugability, and move on to more
interesting problems. We do have plenty of them to solve. :) Perhaps in
doing so we could get a better Rabbit implementati
On 14/04/15 19:54 -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
On 04/14/2015 07:26 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 14/04/15 23:18 +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2015-04-15 01:10:03 +0200 (+0200), Flavio Percoco wrote:
[...]
I'd recommend sending this email to the ops mailing list
And I'd recommend subscribing to
On 15/04/15 00:04 +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2015-04-15 01:26:21 +0200 (+0200), Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 14/04/15 23:18 +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
>On 2015-04-15 01:10:03 +0200 (+0200), Flavio Percoco wrote:
>[...]
>>I'd recommend sending this email to the ops mailing list
>
>And I'd reco
On 2015-04-15 11:53:28 +0200 (+0200), Flavio Percoco wrote:
[...]
> When I proposed removing the GridFS driver from glance_store, I asked
> for feedback in other mailing lists and then came back here proposing
> de dev removal.
Got it--so the recommendation is to not ask the developer community
un
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
> Ken Giusti wrote:
>>
>> Just to be clear: you're asking specifically about the 0-10 based
>> impl_qpid.py driver, correct? This is the driver that is used for
>> the "qpid://" transport (aka rpc_backend).
>>
>> I ask because I'm maintaining
Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 14/04/15 19:54 -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
On 04/14/2015 07:26 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 14/04/15 23:18 +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2015-04-15 01:10:03 +0200 (+0200), Flavio Percoco wrote:
[...]
I'd recommend sending this email to the ops mailing list
And I'd re
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2015-04-14 16:54:30 -0700:
> On 04/14/2015 07:26 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
> > On 14/04/15 23:18 +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> >> On 2015-04-15 01:10:03 +0200 (+0200), Flavio Percoco wrote:
> >> [...]
> >>> I'd recommend sending this email to the ops mailing l
Excerpts from Ken Giusti's message of 2015-04-15 09:31:18 -0400:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
> > Ken Giusti wrote:
> >>
> >> Just to be clear: you're asking specifically about the 0-10 based
> >> impl_qpid.py driver, correct? This is the driver that is used for
> >> t
Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message of 2015-04-15 10:15:11 -0700:
> Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2015-04-14 16:54:30 -0700:
> >
> > It's time to be honest about the level of support that comes with those
> > other backends, deprecate the plugability, and move on to more
> > interesting pr
On 04/14/2015 08:21 PM, Chris Dent wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Apr 2015, Sean Dague wrote:
>
>> It's time to be honest about the level of support that comes with those
>> other backends, deprecate the plugability, and move on to more
>> interesting problems. We do have plenty of them to solve. :) Perhaps
Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2015-04-15 10:48:30 -0700:
> Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message of 2015-04-15 10:15:11 -0700:
> > Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2015-04-14 16:54:30 -0700:
> > >
> > > It's time to be honest about the level of support that comes with those
> > > oth
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> Excerpts from Ken Giusti's message of 2015-04-15 09:31:18 -0400:
>> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
>> > Ken Giusti wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Just to be clear: you're asking specifically about the 0-10 based
>> >> impl_qpid.py
Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message of 2015-04-15 11:02:34 -0700:
> Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2015-04-15 10:48:30 -0700:
> > Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message of 2015-04-15 10:15:11 -0700:
> > > Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2015-04-14 16:54:30 -0700:
> > > >
> > > > It's
Excerpts from Ken Giusti's message of 2015-04-15 14:08:57 -0400:
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> > Excerpts from Ken Giusti's message of 2015-04-15 09:31:18 -0400:
> >> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Joshua Harlow
> >> wrote:
> >> > Ken Giusti wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> J
On 04/15/2015 01:48 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message of 2015-04-15 10:15:11 -0700:
>> Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2015-04-14 16:54:30 -0700:
>>>
>>> It's time to be honest about the level of support that comes with those
>>> other backends, deprecate the plug
As a result of all of the excellent discussions here, I have produced a
spec for policy which I think will assist us all in moving forward on
improving the quality in this space:
https://review.openstack.org/174105
Thanks everyone for your excellent replies!
Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message o
Ken Giusti wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
Excerpts from Ken Giusti's message of 2015-04-15 09:31:18 -0400:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
Ken Giusti wrote:
Just to be clear: you're asking specifically about the 0-10 based
impl_qpid.py dri
On 15/04/15 09:09 -0700, Joshua Harlow wrote:
Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 14/04/15 19:54 -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
On 04/14/2015 07:26 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 14/04/15 23:18 +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2015-04-15 01:10:03 +0200 (+0200), Flavio Percoco wrote:
[...]
I'd recommend sending
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 8:18 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
> Ken Giusti wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Doug Hellmann
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Excerpts from Ken Giusti's message of 2015-04-15 09:31:18 -0400:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Joshua Harlow
wrote:
>
> Ken Giu
- Original Message -
> From: "Ken Giusti"
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>
> Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 4:47:50 PM
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all] QPID incompatible with python 3 and
> untested i
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2015-04-15 15:10:54 -0400:
> On 04/15/2015 01:48 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> > Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message of 2015-04-15 10:15:11 -0700:
> >> Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2015-04-14 16:54:30 -0700:
> >>>
> >>> It's time to be honest about the le
34 matches
Mail list logo
