On 02/04/2016 06:38 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
> 2) Have a registry of "common" names.
>
> Upside, we can safely use common names everywhere and not fear collision
> down the road.
>
> Downside, yet another contention point.
>
> A registry would clearly be under TC administration, though all the
> he
On 02/10/2016 03:03 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 02/04/2016 06:38 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
2) Have a registry of "common" names.
Upside, we can safely use common names everywhere and not fear collision
down the road.
Downside, yet another contention point.
A registry would clearly be under TC admini
Sean Dague wrote:
[...]
3) This be a dedicated repository 'openstack/service-registry'. The API
WG will have votes on it (I would also suggest the folks that have been
working on Service Catalog TNG - myself, Anne Gentle, Brant Knudson, and
Chris Dent be added to this). The actual registry will b
On Wed, 10 Feb 2016, Sean Dague wrote:
If there are concerns with this approach let me know. Otherwise I'll
propose the repo tomorrow and try to keep this ball rolling.
+1. It's a good plan. Thanks for keeping the distillery cooking.
--
Chris Dent (�s°□°)�s�喋擤ォ�http:
