Hi all,
This is a follow-up for the discussion in Dublin PTG about how Neutron API
server should handle invalid query parameter [1]. According to the feedback, I
sent this ML to seek advice from API-WG in this regards.
As a brief recap, we were discussing how Neutron API server should behave if
Hi all,
This is a follow-up for the discussion in Dublin PTG about how Neutron API
server should handle invalid query parameter [1]. According to the feedback, I
sent this ML to seek advice from API-WG in this regards.
As a brief recap, we were discussing how Neutron API server should behave if
On Wed, 7 Mar 2018, Hongbin Lu wrote:
As a brief recap, we were discussing how Neutron API server should behave if
invalid query parameters were inputted. Per my understanding, the general
consensus is to make Neutron API server behave consistently with other
OpenStack projects. The question
Hi all,
Please disregard the email below since I used the wrong template. Sorry about
that. The email with the same content was re-sent in a new thread
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-March/128022.html .
Best regards,
Hongbin
From: Hongbin Lu
Sent: March-07-18 4:02 PM
T
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 6:12 AM, Chris Dent wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Mar 2018, Hongbin Lu wrote:
>
>> As a brief recap, we were discussing how Neutron API server should behave
>> if invalid query parameters were inputted. Per my understanding, the general
>> consensus is to make Neutron API server behave
