Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] about add transformer into libvirt

2017-12-18 Thread gordon chung
On 2017-12-18 10:28 AM, Jaze Lee wrote: > Is there some document about how to use rate? I do not find any about it > Thanks. > https://gnocchi.xyz/rest.html#archive-policy its' similar to how other aggregates are defined. it's just not part of default aggregation methods. -- gord

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] about add transformer into libvirt

2017-12-18 Thread Jaze Lee
2017-12-18 21:17 GMT+08:00 gordon chung : > > > On 2017-12-17 11:08 PM, Jaze Lee wrote: >> Hello. >> >> 2017-12-16 9:30 GMT+08:00 Jaze Lee : >>> 2017-12-15 23:17 GMT+08:00 gordon chung : On 2017-12-14 10:38 PM, Jaze Lee wrote: >

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] about add transformer into libvirt

2017-12-18 Thread gordon chung
On 2017-12-17 11:08 PM, Jaze Lee wrote: > Hello. > > 2017-12-16 9:30 GMT+08:00 Jaze Lee : >> 2017-12-15 23:17 GMT+08:00 gordon chung : >>> >>> >>> On 2017-12-14 10:38 PM, Jaze Lee wrote: It sounds like great. When the gnocchi can be ready to do

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] about add transformer into libvirt

2017-12-17 Thread Jaze Lee
Hello. 2017-12-16 9:30 GMT+08:00 Jaze Lee : > 2017-12-15 23:17 GMT+08:00 gordon chung : >> >> >> On 2017-12-14 10:38 PM, Jaze Lee wrote: >>> It sounds like great. When the gnocchi can be ready to do transformer's >>> work? >>> If it takes long time, we have

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] about add transformer into libvirt

2017-12-15 Thread Jaze Lee
2017-12-15 23:17 GMT+08:00 gordon chung : > > > On 2017-12-14 10:38 PM, Jaze Lee wrote: >> It sounds like great. When the gnocchi can be ready to do transformer's work? >> If it takes long time, we have to move to compute temporarily. > > it already exists in gnocchi 4.1+. we just

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] about add transformer into libvirt

2017-12-15 Thread gordon chung
On 2017-12-14 10:38 PM, Jaze Lee wrote: > It sounds like great. When the gnocchi can be ready to do transformer's work? > If it takes long time, we have to move to compute temporarily. it already exists in gnocchi 4.1+. we just need to change the workflow in ceilometer so it integrates with

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] about add transformer into libvirt

2017-12-14 Thread Jaze Lee
2017-12-14 22:34 GMT+08:00 gordon chung : > > > On 2017-12-14 04:14 AM, Jaze Lee wrote: >>> The plan is to actually make the TSDB (Gnocchi) do that job for us. >> What ? >> Is there some detail on this plan ? If it did, then we do not need >> workload partition, and scale with agent

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] about add transformer into libvirt

2017-12-14 Thread gordon chung
On 2017-12-14 04:14 AM, Jaze Lee wrote: >> The plan is to actually make the TSDB (Gnocchi) do that job for us. > What ? > Is there some detail on this plan ? If it did, then we do not need > workload partition, and scale with agent process happily > Gnocchi can capture rate information

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] about add transformer into libvirt

2017-12-14 Thread Jaze Lee
2017-12-14 16:58 GMT+08:00 Julien Danjou : > On Thu, Dec 14 2017, Jaze Lee wrote: > >> Oh, sorry. I found libvirt can not get cpu.util, cpu.delta, and >> network/disk rate info directly >> from inspector. So i mean, we can move this into compute pollster. >> Before it sends to

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] about add transformer into libvirt

2017-12-14 Thread Julien Danjou
On Thu, Dec 14 2017, Jaze Lee wrote: > Oh, sorry. I found libvirt can not get cpu.util, cpu.delta, and > network/disk rate info directly > from inspector. So i mean, we can move this into compute pollster. > Before it sends to notifications.sample, > transform it. Then we can scale notification

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] about add transformer into libvirt

2017-12-13 Thread Jaze Lee
2017-12-13 21:16 GMT+08:00 gordon chung : > > > On 2017-12-13 01:52 AM, Jaze Lee wrote: >> Hello, >> >> What about move transformer to compute pollster? If we do this, we >> do not need >> transformer any more > > sorry, i don't understand. if you move the transformer,

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] about add transformer into libvirt

2017-12-13 Thread gordon chung
On 2017-12-13 01:52 AM, Jaze Lee wrote: > Hello, > > What about move transformer to compute pollster? If we do this, we > do not need > transformer any more sorry, i don't understand. if you move the transformer, you still have a transformer. -- gord

[openstack-dev] [ceilometer] about add transformer into libvirt

2017-12-12 Thread Jaze Lee
Hello, What about move transformer to compute pollster? If we do this, we do not need transformer any more -- 谦谦君子 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: