On 2017-12-18 10:28 AM, Jaze Lee wrote:
> Is there some document about how to use rate? I do not find any about it
> Thanks.
>
https://gnocchi.xyz/rest.html#archive-policy
its' similar to how other aggregates are defined. it's just not part of
default aggregation methods.
--
gord
2017-12-18 21:17 GMT+08:00 gordon chung :
>
>
> On 2017-12-17 11:08 PM, Jaze Lee wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> 2017-12-16 9:30 GMT+08:00 Jaze Lee :
>>> 2017-12-15 23:17 GMT+08:00 gordon chung :
On 2017-12-14 10:38 PM, Jaze Lee wrote:
>
On 2017-12-17 11:08 PM, Jaze Lee wrote:
> Hello.
>
> 2017-12-16 9:30 GMT+08:00 Jaze Lee :
>> 2017-12-15 23:17 GMT+08:00 gordon chung :
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2017-12-14 10:38 PM, Jaze Lee wrote:
It sounds like great. When the gnocchi can be ready to do
Hello.
2017-12-16 9:30 GMT+08:00 Jaze Lee :
> 2017-12-15 23:17 GMT+08:00 gordon chung :
>>
>>
>> On 2017-12-14 10:38 PM, Jaze Lee wrote:
>>> It sounds like great. When the gnocchi can be ready to do transformer's
>>> work?
>>> If it takes long time, we have
2017-12-15 23:17 GMT+08:00 gordon chung :
>
>
> On 2017-12-14 10:38 PM, Jaze Lee wrote:
>> It sounds like great. When the gnocchi can be ready to do transformer's work?
>> If it takes long time, we have to move to compute temporarily.
>
> it already exists in gnocchi 4.1+. we just
On 2017-12-14 10:38 PM, Jaze Lee wrote:
> It sounds like great. When the gnocchi can be ready to do transformer's work?
> If it takes long time, we have to move to compute temporarily.
it already exists in gnocchi 4.1+. we just need to change the workflow
in ceilometer so it integrates with
2017-12-14 22:34 GMT+08:00 gordon chung :
>
>
> On 2017-12-14 04:14 AM, Jaze Lee wrote:
>>> The plan is to actually make the TSDB (Gnocchi) do that job for us.
>> What ?
>> Is there some detail on this plan ? If it did, then we do not need
>> workload partition, and scale with agent
On 2017-12-14 04:14 AM, Jaze Lee wrote:
>> The plan is to actually make the TSDB (Gnocchi) do that job for us.
> What ?
> Is there some detail on this plan ? If it did, then we do not need
> workload partition, and scale with agent process happily
>
Gnocchi can capture rate information
2017-12-14 16:58 GMT+08:00 Julien Danjou :
> On Thu, Dec 14 2017, Jaze Lee wrote:
>
>> Oh, sorry. I found libvirt can not get cpu.util, cpu.delta, and
>> network/disk rate info directly
>> from inspector. So i mean, we can move this into compute pollster.
>> Before it sends to
On Thu, Dec 14 2017, Jaze Lee wrote:
> Oh, sorry. I found libvirt can not get cpu.util, cpu.delta, and
> network/disk rate info directly
> from inspector. So i mean, we can move this into compute pollster.
> Before it sends to notifications.sample,
> transform it. Then we can scale notification
2017-12-13 21:16 GMT+08:00 gordon chung :
>
>
> On 2017-12-13 01:52 AM, Jaze Lee wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> What about move transformer to compute pollster? If we do this, we
>> do not need
>> transformer any more
>
> sorry, i don't understand. if you move the transformer,
On 2017-12-13 01:52 AM, Jaze Lee wrote:
> Hello,
>
> What about move transformer to compute pollster? If we do this, we
> do not need
> transformer any more
sorry, i don't understand. if you move the transformer, you still have a
transformer.
--
gord
Hello,
What about move transformer to compute pollster? If we do this, we
do not need
transformer any more
--
谦谦君子
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe:
13 matches
Mail list logo