Re: [openstack-dev] [charms] Re-licensing OpenStack charms under Apache 2.0

2016-06-17 Thread Gabriel Samfira
Hi James, No problem on my side. This is a welcome change! Regards, Gabriel Samfira Cloudbase Solutions SRL On Mi, 2016-06-08 at 10:20 +, James Page wrote: > Hi > > We're currently blocked on becoming an OpenStack project under the > big-tent by the licensing of the 26 OpenStack charms und

Re: [openstack-dev] [charms] Re-licensing OpenStack charms under Apache 2.0

2016-06-12 Thread Andrey Pavlov
Hello James, No problem on my side. Regards, Andrey. On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 1:20 PM, James Page wrote: > Hi > > We're currently blocked on becoming an OpenStack project under the big-tent > by the licensing of the 26 OpenStack charms under GPL v3. > > I'm proposing that we re-license the follow

Re: [openstack-dev] [charms] Re-licensing OpenStack charms under Apache 2.0

2016-06-11 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 6:45 PM, Bilal Baqar wrote: > Hey James > > No problem on my side for this change. > > Regards > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Neil Jerram wrote: > >> Me too. >> >> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 10:32 AM Cory Benfield wrote: >> >>> >>> > On 8 Jun 2016, at 11:20, James Pag

Re: [openstack-dev] [charms] Re-licensing OpenStack charms under Apache 2.0

2016-06-10 Thread Bilal Baqar
Hey James No problem on my side for this change. Regards On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Neil Jerram wrote: > Me too. > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 10:32 AM Cory Benfield wrote: > >> >> > On 8 Jun 2016, at 11:20, James Page wrote: >> > >> > The majority of contributors are from Canonical (fro

Re: [openstack-dev] [charms] Re-licensing OpenStack charms under Apache 2.0

2016-06-10 Thread Neil Jerram
Me too. On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 10:32 AM Cory Benfield wrote: > > > On 8 Jun 2016, at 11:20, James Page wrote: > > > > The majority of contributors are from Canonical (from whom I have > permission to make this switch) with a further 18 contributors from outside > of Canonical who I will be dir

Re: [openstack-dev] [charms] Re-licensing OpenStack charms under Apache 2.0

2016-06-10 Thread Cory Benfield
> On 8 Jun 2016, at 11:20, James Page wrote: > > The majority of contributors are from Canonical (from whom I have permission > to make this switch) with a further 18 contributors from outside of Canonical > who I will be directly contacting for approval in gerrit as reviews are > raised for

Re: [openstack-dev] [charms] Re-licensing OpenStack charms under Apache 2.0

2016-06-08 Thread Gauvain Pocentek
Hi James, Le 2016-06-08 12:20, James Page a écrit : Hi We're currently blocked on becoming an OpenStack project under the big-tent by the licensing of the 26 OpenStack charms under GPL v3. I'm proposing that we re-license the following code repositories as Apache 2.0:   charm-ceilometer   c

[openstack-dev] [charms] Re-licensing OpenStack charms under Apache 2.0

2016-06-08 Thread James Page
Hi We're currently blocked on becoming an OpenStack project under the big-tent by the licensing of the 26 OpenStack charms under GPL v3. I'm proposing that we re-license the following code repositories as Apache 2.0: charm-ceilometer charm-ceilometer-agent charm-ceph charm-ceph-mon cha