On 10/8/2018 8:54 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote:
On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 03:09:36PM +0800, Yikun Jiang wrote:
In Denver, we agree to add a new "re-image" API in cinder to support upport
volume-backed server rebuild with a new image.
An initial blueprint has been drafted in [3], welcome to review
On 10/9/2018 8:04 AM, Erlon Cruz wrote:
If you are planning to re-image an image on a bootable volume then yes
you should use a force parameter. I have lost the discussion about this
on PTG. What is the main use cases? This seems to me something that
could be leveraged with the current
If you are planning to re-image an image on a bootable volume then yes you
should use a force parameter. I have lost the discussion about this on PTG.
What is the main use cases? This seems to me something that could be
leveraged with the current revert-to-snapshot API, which would be even
better.
On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 03:09:36PM +0800, Yikun Jiang wrote:
> In Denver, we agree to add a new "re-image" API in cinder to support upport
> volume-backed server rebuild with a new image.
>
> An initial blueprint has been drafted in [3], welcome to review it, thanks.
> : )
>
> [snip]
>
> The
In Denver, we agree to add a new "re-image" API in cinder to support upport
volume-backed server rebuild with a new image.
An initial blueprint has been drafted in [3], welcome to review it, thanks.
: )
The API is very simple, something like:
URL:
POST
