Hello all,
Currently for cross-project specs, the author of the spec spends the time to
explain why a certain feature makes sense to be across multiple projects. This
also includes giving technical solutions for it working with a variety of
services and making sure everyone is happy.
Today we hav
Mike Perez wrote:
> [...]
> I would like to propose cross-project liaisons which would have the following
> duties:
>
> * Watching the cross-project spec repo [1].
> - Comment on specs that involve your project. +1 to carry forward for TC
> approval.
> -- If you're not able to provide t
As someone who's surprised more than one team with a patch that apparently
came from left field (until I pointed out the x-project spec), I'm totally
for this.
Michael
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 1:45 AM Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Mike Perez wrote:
> > [...]
> > I would like to propose cross-project li
Excerpts from Mike Perez's message of 2015-11-30 17:30:52 -0800:
> Hello all,
>
> Currently for cross-project specs, the author of the spec spends the time to
> explain why a certain feature makes sense to be across multiple projects. This
> also includes giving technical solutions for it working
On 11/30/2015 08:30 PM, Mike Perez wrote:
Hello all,
Currently for cross-project specs, the author of the spec spends the time to
explain why a certain feature makes sense to be across multiple projects. This
also includes giving technical solutions for it working with a variety of
services and
On 09:29 Dec 01, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> Excerpts from Mike Perez's message of 2015-11-30 17:30:52 -0800:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > Currently for cross-project specs, the author of the spec spends the time to
> > explain why a certain feature makes sense to be across multiple projects.
> > This
> > a
Excerpts from Mike Perez's message of 2015-12-01 08:45:30 -0800:
> On 09:29 Dec 01, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> > Excerpts from Mike Perez's message of 2015-11-30 17:30:52 -0800:
> > > Hello all,
> > >
> > > Currently for cross-project specs, the author of the spec spends the time
> > > to
> > > expla
