t;openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [docs][release][ptl] Adding docs to the
release schedule
> On 3/2/17 9:45 AM, Ian Cordasco wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Telles Nobrega
> > Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
Stack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> Cc: openstack-d...@lists.openstack.org <openstack-d...@lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [docs][release][ptl] Adding docs to the
> release schedule
>
>
t;openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
Cc: openstack-d...@lists.openstack.org <openstack-d...@lists.openstack.org>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [docs][release][ptl] Adding docs to the
release schedule
> I really believe that this idea will makes us work harder on keeping our
> docs in place
lt;
> openstack-d...@lists.openstack.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [openstack-dev] [docs][release][ptl] Adding docs to the
> release schedule
>
>
>
> On 1 Mar 2017, at 10:07, Alexandra Settle wrote:
>
> On 3/1/17, 5:58 PM, "John Dickinson" <m...@not.mn> wrote:
>
>
ack.org>
Cc: "openstack-d...@lists.openstack.org" <openstack-d...@lists.openstack.org>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [docs][release][ptl] Adding docs to the release
schedule
On 1 Mar 2017, at 10:07, Alexandra Settle wrote:
On 3/1/17, 5:58 PM, "John Dickinson" <m...@not.mn> wro
On 1 Mar 2017, at 10:07, Alexandra Settle wrote:
> On 3/1/17, 5:58 PM, "John Dickinson" wrote:
>
>
>
> On 1 Mar 2017, at 9:52, Alexandra Settle wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I would like to propose that we introduce a “Review documentation”
> period on the
On 3/1/17, 5:58 PM, "John Dickinson" wrote:
On 1 Mar 2017, at 9:52, Alexandra Settle wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I would like to propose that we introduce a “Review documentation” period
on the release schedule.
>
> We would formulate it as a
On 1 Mar 2017, at 9:52, Alexandra Settle wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I would like to propose that we introduce a “Review documentation” period on
> the release schedule.
>
> We would formulate it as a deadline, so that it fits in the schedule and
> making it coincide with the RC1 deadline.
>
>
Hi everyone,
I would like to propose that we introduce a “Review documentation” period on
the release schedule.
We would formulate it as a deadline, so that it fits in the schedule and making
it coincide with the RC1 deadline.
For projects that are not following the milestones, we would