[openstack-dev] [glance] Auth_version from 'old style' URLs in the database

2015-12-03 Thread Bunting, Niall
Hi, Currently glance will use an auth_url if in the database. Eg. 10.0.0.8:5000/v2.0 However glance currently takes the auth_version from the config files. Therefore this can lead to a mismatch of keystone version to be used between the url and the config files. This is problematic due to a diffe

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Auth_version from 'old style' URLs in the database

2015-12-04 Thread Kairat Kushaev
Hi, there is another potential risk when using urls from database. Once keystone v2 would be down there is no way to request image using urls in database like 10.0.0.8:5000/v2.0. The only possible option is to update db entries in glance but I am not sure that it is corr

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Auth_version from 'old style' URLs in the database

2015-12-04 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 03/12/15 16:24 +, Bunting, Niall wrote: Hi, Currently glance will use an auth_url if in the database. Eg. 10.0.0.8:5000/v2.0 However glance currently takes the auth_version from the config files. Therefore this can lead to a mismatch of keystone version to be used between the url and the

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Auth_version from 'old style' URLs in the database

2015-12-07 Thread Brant Knudson
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Bunting, Niall wrote: > Hi, > > Currently glance will use an auth_url if in the database. Eg. > 10.0.0.8:5000/v2.0 > > However glance currently takes the auth_version from the config > files. Therefore this can lead to a mismatch of keystone version to be used > b

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Auth_version from 'old style' URLs in the database

2015-12-07 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Flavio Percoco's message of 2015-12-04 07:00:53 -0800: > On 03/12/15 16:24 +, Bunting, Niall wrote: > >Hi, > > > >Currently glance will use an auth_url if in the database. Eg. > >10.0.0.8:5000/v2.0 > > > >However glance currently takes the auth_version from the config > >files. T