, April 21, 2015 9:45 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Why no DB index on sort parameters
On 4/21/15 2:47 AM, Ajaya Agrawal wrote:
Hi All,
I see that glance supports arbitrary sort parameters and the default
is
created_at while
From: Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com mailto:fla...@redhat.com
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 7:52 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Why no DB index on sort parameters
On 21/04/15 14
: Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 7:52 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Why no DB index on sort parameters
On 21/04/15 14:55 +, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
Rally is great overall however, we need good
: [openstack-dev] [glance] Why no DB index on sort parameters
On 4/21/15 2:47 AM, Ajaya Agrawal wrote:
Hi All,
I see that glance supports arbitrary sort parameters and the default is
created_at while listing images. Is there any reason why we don't have
index over these fields? If we
Hi All,
I see that glance supports arbitrary sort parameters and the default is
created_at while listing images. Is there any reason why we don't have
index over these fields? If we have an index over these fields then we
would avoid a full table scan to do sorting. IMO at least the created_at
On 21/04/15 12:17 +0530, Ajaya Agrawal wrote:
Hi All,
I see that glance supports arbitrary sort parameters and the default is
created_at while listing images. Is there any reason why we don't have index
over these fields? If we have an index over these fields then we would avoid a
full table
] [glance] Why no DB index on sort parameters
On 4/21/15 2:47 AM, Ajaya Agrawal wrote:
Hi All,
I see that glance supports arbitrary sort parameters and the default is
created_at while listing images. Is there any reason why we don't have index
over these fields? If we have an index over these fields
: [openstack-dev] [glance] Why no DB index on sort parameters
On 4/21/15 2:47 AM, Ajaya Agrawal wrote:
Hi All,
I see that glance supports arbitrary sort parameters and the default is
created_at while listing images. Is there any reason why we don't have
index over these fields? If we
On 4/21/15 2:47 AM, Ajaya Agrawal wrote:
Hi All,
I see that glance supports arbitrary sort parameters and the default
is created_at while listing images. Is there any reason why we don't
have index over these fields? If we have an index over these fields
then we would avoid a full table
