Zaro <zaro0...@gmail.com> wrote on 10/20/2015 07:49:13 PM:
> From: Zaro <zaro0...@gmail.com>
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
> <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> Date: 10/20/2015 07:54 PM
> Subject: Re: [open
On 10/20/2015 12:43 PM, Dolph Mathews wrote:
> This is actually something I've thought a lot about (focusing the
> community's review efforts), and have experimented with various
> solutions in the keystone community. I've built external solutions that
> have worked fairly well, but my current
"Daniel P. Berrange" <berra...@redhat.com> wrote on 10/20/2015 06:21:05
> PM:
>
>> From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berra...@redhat.com>
>> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>> <openstack-dev@lists.openstack
This is actually something I've thought a lot about (focusing the
community's review efforts), and have experimented with various solutions
in the keystone community. I've built external solutions that have worked
fairly well, but my current preference is to take advantage of what's
already built
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Dolph Mathews
wrote:
> This is actually something I've thought a lot about (focusing the
> community's review efforts), and have experimented with various solutions
> in the keystone community. I've built external solutions that have
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 10/20/2015 12:43 PM, Dolph Mathews wrote:
> > This is actually something I've thought a lot about (focusing the
> > community's review efforts), and have experimented with various
> > solutions in the keystone community.
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 06:09:51PM +0200, Markus Zoeller wrote:
> In ML post [1] I wondered if it would be possible to introduce a new
> "prio" label in Gerrit which could help in focusing review efforts to
> increase the throughput. With this new post I'd like to discuss if we
> think this could
> Date: 10/20/2015 06:21 PM
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][all] Reviews with a prio label?
> What you're describing is really just a special-case of allowing
> arbitrary user tagging of changes. If gerrit had a free-format
> keyword tag facility that users could use & qu
In ML post [1] I wondered if it would be possible to introduce a new
"prio" label in Gerrit which could help in focusing review efforts to
increase the throughput. With this new post I'd like to discuss if we
think this could be useful. For example, this would allow to create this
query in Gerrit: