Andreas,
Totally understand the overload problem with no short-term workarounds. I
think all engineering in OpenStack is over capacity a bit and folks are
really burning the midnight oil to make sure Mitaka is the best release of
OpenStack yet!
Please feel free to drop by #kolla and ping the cor
On 2016-02-11 02:50, Joshua Hesketh wrote:
> Hey Andreas,
>
> Why not keep pep8 as an alias for the new linters target? Would this
> allow for a transition path while work on updating the PTI is done?
pep8 and linters do different work in infra, and infra calls pep8. A
project can have both...
I
Hey Andreas,
Why not keep pep8 as an alias for the new linters target? Would this allow
for a transition path while work on updating the PTI is done?
Cheers,
Josh
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 6:55 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the pep8 target is our usual target to include style and lint chec
Hi,
the pep8 target is our usual target to include style and lint checks and
thus is used besides pep8 also for doc8, bashate, bandit, etc as
documented in the PTI (=Python Test Interface,
http://governance.openstack.org/reference/cti/python_cti.html).
We've had some discussions to introduce a ne