> this is a reflection of the discussion I just had on #openstack-infra; it's
> about (re-)using the central CI infrastructure for our Open-Source DRBD
> driver too.
As this is done now, I'd like to discuss a few points.
First of all -- thanks to everybody involved; if you happen to find someon
Anita Kuno writes:
> I'd like to make sure that if Infra is saying that CI jobs on drivers
> can gate that this is a substantial difference from what I have been
> saying for a year, specifically that they can't and won't.
For the purposes of this conversation, the distinction between drivers
an
On 02/24/2015 04:40 AM, Duncan Thomas wrote:
> For cinder, we don't want to gate on drivers, and will be unhappy if that
> gets turned on, so the story hasn't changed, Anita.
>
> I think Jim was pointing out the technical possibility, which is a fine and
> valid thing to point out. Cinder core are
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015, at 11:24 AM, Philipp Marek wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> this is a reflection of the discussion I just had on #openstack-infra;
> it's
> about (re-)using the central CI infrastructure for our Open-Source DRBD
> driver too.
>
>
> The current status is:
> * The DRBD driver is alrea
Hi all,
this is a reflection of the discussion I just had on #openstack-infra; it's
about (re-)using the central CI infrastructure for our Open-Source DRBD
driver too.
The current status is:
* The DRBD driver is already in Cinder, so DRBD-replicated Cinder storage
using iSCSI to the hyperv
