Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] openstack/requirements repo has a stable/icehouse branch...

2016-02-04 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2016-02-04 18:17:07 + (+), Jeremy Stanley wrote: > I was getting around to taking care of this just now, and it looks > like someone has deleted the stable/icehouse branch without tagging > it icehouse-eol first? [...] Nevermind--it's still there. Perhaps I need glasses (or afternoon

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] openstack/requirements repo has a stable/icehouse branch...

2016-02-04 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2015-12-16 15:35:23 -0600 (-0600), Matt Riedemann wrote: > That should be deleted, right? Or are there random projects that > still have stable/icehouse branches in projects.txt and we care > about them? I was getting around to taking care of this just now, and it looks like someone has

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] openstack/requirements repo has a stable/icehouse branch...

2016-02-04 Thread Dean Troyer
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > Nevermind--it's still there. Perhaps I need glasses (or afternoon > coffee). > Nah, the fastest way to find something like that is to send a note to a public mail list. :) dt -- Dean Troyer dtro...@gmail.com

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] openstack/requirements repo has a stable/icehouse branch...

2015-12-16 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Jeremy, Thanks. +1 from me. -- dims On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 11:41 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2015-12-16 15:35:23 -0600 (-0600), Matt Riedemann wrote: >> That should be deleted, right? Or are there random projects that still have >> stable/icehouse branches in

[openstack-dev] [infra] openstack/requirements repo has a stable/icehouse branch...

2015-12-16 Thread Matt Riedemann
That should be deleted, right? Or are there random projects that still have stable/icehouse branches in projects.txt and we care about them? -- Thanks, Matt Riedemann __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] openstack/requirements repo has a stable/icehouse branch...

2015-12-16 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2015-12-16 15:35:23 -0600 (-0600), Matt Riedemann wrote: > That should be deleted, right? Or are there random projects that still have > stable/icehouse branches in projects.txt and we care about them? I believe I simply missed it during the stable/icehouse batch EOL. That was the timeframe