Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][docs] What is the policy for backporting docs changes to stable branches?

2016-10-05 Thread Tony Breeds
On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 09:37:07AM -0400, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 9:00 AM, Luigi Toscano wrote: > > On Wednesday, 5 October 2016 15:31:50 CEST Pavlo Shchelokovskyy wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> lately I realized that docs for two of the features I was

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][docs] What is the policy for backporting docs changes to stable branches?

2016-10-05 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 9:00 AM, Luigi Toscano wrote: > On Wednesday, 5 October 2016 15:31:50 CEST Pavlo Shchelokovskyy wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> lately I realized that docs for two of the features I was working on during >> Newton cycle are absent from Ironic's new install

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][docs] What is the policy for backporting docs changes to stable branches?

2016-10-05 Thread Luigi Toscano
On Wednesday, 5 October 2016 15:31:50 CEST Pavlo Shchelokovskyy wrote: > Hi all, > > lately I realized that docs for two of the features I was working on during > Newton cycle are absent from Ironic's new install guide [0]. This is my > fault, and I am sorry for missing that out. Currently I am

[openstack-dev] [ironic][docs] What is the policy for backporting docs changes to stable branches?

2016-10-05 Thread Pavlo Shchelokovskyy
Hi all, lately I realized that docs for two of the features I was working on during Newton cycle are absent from Ironic's new install guide [0]. This is my fault, and I am sorry for missing that out. Currently I am working on adding those pieces. The two omissions I am worried about are: -