Hi folks!
I've been dodging subj for some time (mostly due to my laziness), but
now it seems like the time has come. We're discussing 2 big features:
autodiscovery and HA that I would like us to have a proper consensus on.
I'd like to get your opinion on one of the options:
1. Do not have spe
Hi all,
+1 for specs in general, big features require a proper review and
discussion for which LP is not a good choice.
+1 for not requiring a spec for small features, LP BP is enough for just
time/release tracking, but of course cores can request a proper spec to be
proposed if feeling feature i
On 11/19/2015 02:39 PM, Pavlo Shchelokovskyy wrote:
Hi all,
+1 for specs in general, big features require a proper review and
discussion for which LP is not a good choice.
+1 for not requiring a spec for small features, LP BP is enough for just
time/release tracking, but of course cores can req
Agree, we certainly need specs for discussing big feature, it would more
effective than ml;
not sure about for best place for it, probably we can start from
ironic-specs, and then decide do we need separate repo or not.
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Pavlo Shchelokovskyy <
pshchelokovs...@mirant
On 19 November 2015 at 08:39, Pavlo Shchelokovskyy <
pshchelokovs...@mirantis.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> +1 for specs in general, big features require a proper review and
> discussion for which LP is not a good choice.
>
> +1 for not requiring a spec for small features, LP BP is enough for just
> t
FYI: the process is in effect now.
Please submit specs to https://github.com/openstack/ironic-inspector-specs/
Approved specs will appear on
http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/ironic-inspector-specs/
On 11/19/2015 02:19 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
Hi folks!
I've been dodging subj for some ti
Hi Dmitry,
should we also configure Launchpad to have blueprints references there (for
release/milestone targeting etc)? Or is it not needed?
Cheers,
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 4:00 PM Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
> FYI: the process is in effect now.
>
> Please submit specs to
> https://github.com/openst
On 12/03/2015 06:13 PM, Pavlo Shchelokovskyy wrote:
Hi Dmitry,
should we also configure Launchpad to have blueprints references there
(for release/milestone targeting etc)? Or is it not needed?
Not sure what you mean, we do have Launchpad configured for blueprints.
We used and will continue t
Oh, I just found it. Sorry for bothering.
Cheers,
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 12:03 PM Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
> On 12/03/2015 06:13 PM, Pavlo Shchelokovskyy wrote:
> > Hi Dmitry,
> >
> > should we also configure Launchpad to have blueprints references there
> > (for release/milestone targeting etc)?