Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] versioning of IPA, it is time or is it?

for usage questions)" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] versioning of IPA, it is time or is it? I personally think that we need IPA versioning, but not so that we can pin a version. We need versioning so that we can do more intelligent graceful degrad

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] versioning of IPA, it is time or is it?

ck-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] versioning of IPA, it is time or is it? 2 июня 2016 г. 10:19 PM пользователь "Loo, Ruby" <ruby@intel.com<mailto:ruby@intel.com>> написал: > > Hi, > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] versioning of IPA, it is time or is it?

2 июня 2016 г. 10:19 PM пользователь "Loo, Ruby" написал: > > Hi, > > I recently reviewed a patch [1] that is trying to address an issue with ironic (master) talking to a ramdisk that has a mitaka IPA lurking around. > > It made me think that IPA may no longer be a teenager

[openstack-dev] [ironic] versioning of IPA, it is time or is it?

Hi, I recently reviewed a patch [1] that is trying to address an issue with ironic (master) talking to a ramdisk that has a mitaka IPA lurking around. It made me think that IPA may no longer be a teenager (yay, boo). IPA now has a stable branch. I think it is time it grows up and acts