200 Warden Ave
>> Markham, ON L6G 1C7
>> Canada
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From:Dolph Mathews
>> To:"OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
>> questions)" ,
>> Date:07/07/2014 01:39 PM
>> Sub
>
>
> From:Dolph Mathews
> To:"OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
> ,
> Date:07/07/2014 01:39 PM
> Subject:Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][specs] listing the entire
> API in anew spec
> --
; ,
Date:
07/07/2014 01:39 PM
Subject:
Re: [openstack-dev]
[keystone][specs] listing the entire API in a new
spec
On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 12:31 AM, Steve Martinelli <steve...@ca.ibm.com>
wrote:
To add to the growing pains of keystone-specs,
one thing I've not
On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 12:31 AM, Steve Martinelli
wrote:
> To add to the growing pains of keystone-specs, one thing I've noticed is,
> there is inconsistency in the 'REST API Impact' section.
>
> To be clear here, I don't mean we shouldn't include what new APIs will be
> created, I think that is
To add to the growing pains of keystone-specs,
one thing I've noticed is, there is inconsistency in the 'REST API Impact'
section.
To be clear here, I don't mean we shouldn't
include what new APIs will be created, I think that is essential. But rather,
remove the need to specifically spell out the
