On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 12:06 PM Attila Fazekas wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Long time ago it was discussed to make the keystone HEAD responses
> right [1] as the RFC [2][3] recommends:
>
> " A response to the HEAD method is identical to what an equivalent
>request made with a
Based on the comments and opinions in the original thread, I think a fix
for this is justified. I wouldn't mind running this by the TC to double
check that nothing has changed from the first time we had to fix this
issue though.
On 07/11/2017 06:03 AM, Attila Fazekas wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Long
Hi all,
Long time ago it was discussed to make the keystone HEAD responses
right [1] as the RFC [2][3] recommends:
" A response to the HEAD method is identical to what an equivalent
request made with a GET would have been, except it lacks a body. "
So, the status code needs to be identical