Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] 40 hour time commitment requested from core reviewers before Feb 9th/10th midcycle

2016-01-26 Thread Michał Dulko
On 01/23/2016 02:32 AM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: > Hello, > > In our weekly IRC meeting, all developers and others in attendance > were in unanimous agreement that upgrades are the #1 priority for > Kolla to solve [1]. inc0 has developed both a simple database > migration implementation

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] 40 hour time commitment requested from core reviewers before Feb 9th/10th midcycle

2016-01-26 Thread Michał Jastrzębski
Well we still can perform upgrades with some API downtime, so it's not like we're bound to rolling upgrades on architectural level. I'll talk to you after midcycle and we'll find a good way to tackle it. Cheers, Michal On 26 January 2016 at 08:40, Michał Dulko wrote: >

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] 40 hour time commitment requested from core reviewers before Feb 9th/10th midcycle

2016-01-26 Thread Michał Dulko
On 01/26/2016 10:11 AM, Michał Jastrzębski wrote: > Well we still can perform upgrades with some API downtime, so it's not > like we're bound to rolling upgrades on architectural level. I'll talk > to you after midcycle and we'll find a good way to tackle it. Sure, this will work. projects.yaml

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] 40 hour time commitment requested from core reviewers before Feb 9th/10th midcycle

2016-01-26 Thread Sam Yaple
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Sean M. Collins wrote: > Just an FYI for anyone taking the Neutron piece, please feel free to > attend the upgrades subteam - we have a meeting today. > > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Neutron-Upgrades-Subteam > -- > Sean M.

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] 40 hour time commitment requested from core reviewers before Feb 9th/10th midcycle

2016-01-26 Thread Steven Dake (stdake)
On 1/26/16, 8:35 AM, "Michał Dulko" wrote: >On 01/26/2016 10:11 AM, Michał Jastrzębski wrote: >> Well we still can perform upgrades with some API downtime, so it's not >> like we're bound to rolling upgrades on architectural level. I'll talk >> to you after midcycle and

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] 40 hour time commitment requested from core reviewers before Feb 9th/10th midcycle

2016-01-25 Thread Sean M. Collins
Just an FYI for anyone taking the Neutron piece, please feel free to attend the upgrades subteam - we have a meeting today. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Neutron-Upgrades-Subteam -- Sean M. Collins __ OpenStack

[openstack-dev] [kolla] 40 hour time commitment requested from core reviewers before Feb 9th/10th midcycle

2016-01-22 Thread Steven Dake (stdake)
Hello, In our weekly IRC meeting, all developers and others in attendance were in unanimous agreement that upgrades are the #1 priority for Kolla to solve [1]. inc0 has developed both a simple database migration implementation around keystone [2] as well as a more complex playbook around