[openstack-dev] [neutron] networking-odl 12.0.0.0rc1 (queens)

2018-02-09 Thread no-reply
Hello everyone, A new release candidate for networking-odl for the end of the Queens cycle is available! You can find the source code tarball at: https://tarballs.openstack.org/networking-odl/ Unless release-critical issues are found that warrant a release candidate respin, this candidate

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-odl]

2017-11-07 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
k.org >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-odl] >> >> hi, >> >> On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 9:01 AM, Bhatia, Manjeet S >> wrote: >> > Hello Neutrinos, >> > >> > >> > >> > I’ve been trying service profile flavors fo

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-odl]

2017-11-07 Thread Bhatia, Manjeet S
> -Original Message- > From: Takashi Yamamoto [mailto:yamam...@midokura.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 7, 2017 10:13 PM > To: Bhatia, Manjeet S > Cc: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-odl] > > hi, > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-odl]

2017-11-07 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hi, On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 9:01 AM, Bhatia, Manjeet S wrote: > Hello Neutrinos, > > > > I’ve been trying service profile flavors for L3 in neutron to register the > driver, > > the method I’ve been using is below > > > > I have this added to neutron.conf > > [service_providers] > > service_provid

[openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-odl]

2017-11-01 Thread Bhatia, Manjeet S
Hello Neutrinos, I've been trying service profile flavors for L3 in neutron to register the driver, the method I've been using is below I have this added to neutron.conf [service_providers] service_provider = L3_ROUTER_NAT:ODL:networking_odl.l3.l3_flavor.ODLL3ServiceProvider:default and then t

[openstack-dev] [neutron] networking-odl 11.0.0.0rc2 (pike)

2017-08-24 Thread no-reply
Hello everyone, A new release candidate for networking-odl for the end of the Pike cycle is available! You can find the source code tarball at: https://tarballs.openstack.org/networking-odl/ Unless release-critical issues are found that warrant a release candidate respin, this candidate wi

[openstack-dev] [neutron] networking-odl 11.0.0.0rc1 (pike)

2017-08-11 Thread no-reply
Hello everyone, A new release candidate for networking-odl for the end of the Pike cycle is available! You can find the source code tarball at: https://tarballs.openstack.org/networking-odl/ Unless release-critical issues are found that warrant a release candidate respin, this candidate wi

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-odl][qa] What's the recommended behavior for SG Rules with ethertype='IPv6' and protocol='icmp' ?

2017-04-04 Thread Brian Haley
On 04/03/2017 09:23 PM, Ghanshyam Mann wrote: On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 9:31 PM, Sridhar Gaddam mailto:sgad...@redhat.com>> wrote: On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 7:27 PM, Brian Haley mailto:haleyb@gmail.com>> wrote: On 03/24/2017 06:41 AM, Ghanshyam Mann wrote: Hi All,

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-odl][qa] What's the recommended behavior for SG Rules with ethertype='IPv6' and protocol='icmp' ?

2017-04-03 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 9:31 PM, Sridhar Gaddam wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 7:27 PM, Brian Haley wrote: > >> On 03/24/2017 06:41 AM, Ghanshyam Mann wrote: >> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> Tempest is testing SG rule creation and pinging scenario tests with >>> ethertype='IPv6' and protocol='icmp'

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-odl][qa] What's the recommended behavior for SG Rules with ethertype='IPv6' and protocol='icmp' ?

2017-03-26 Thread Sridhar Gaddam
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 7:27 PM, Brian Haley wrote: > On 03/24/2017 06:41 AM, Ghanshyam Mann wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> Tempest is testing SG rule creation and pinging scenario tests with >> ethertype='IPv6' and protocol='icmp' [0]. >> In case of ethertype='IPv6', currently neutron accept protocol

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-odl][qa] What's the recommended behavior for SG Rules with ethertype='IPv6' and protocol='icmp' ?

2017-03-24 Thread Brian Haley
On 03/24/2017 06:41 AM, Ghanshyam Mann wrote: Hi All, Tempest is testing SG rule creation and pinging scenario tests with ethertype='IPv6' and protocol='icmp' [0]. In case of ethertype='IPv6', currently neutron accept protocol type as 'icmp', 'icmpv6' and 'ipv6-icmp' which again seems like dupli

[openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-odl][qa] What's the recommended behavior for SG Rules with ethertype='IPv6' and protocol='icmp' ?

2017-03-24 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, Tempest is testing SG rule creation and pinging scenario tests with ethertype='IPv6' and protocol='icmp' [0]. In case of ethertype='IPv6', currently neutron accept protocol type as 'icmp', 'icmpv6' and 'ipv6-icmp' which again seems like duplication of SG rules bug on neutron side but not s

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-odl] Fwd: [Openstack-stable-maint] Stable check of openstack/networking-odl failed

2016-11-24 Thread Rui Zang
Thanks for the notification. We are looking into it. On 11/25/2016 8:09 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: Hi, Seems like newton branch of networking-odl is pulling neutron from master. Whoever is responsible for the subproject, please fix. Begin forwarded message: *From: *"A mailing list for the O

[openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-odl] Fwd: [Openstack-stable-maint] Stable check of openstack/networking-odl failed

2016-11-24 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
Hi, Seems like newton branch of networking-odl is pulling neutron from master. Whoever is responsible for the subproject, please fix. > Begin forwarded message: > > From: "A mailing list for the OpenStack Stable Branch test reports." > > Subject: [Openstack-stable-maint] Stable check of opens

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][networking-odl] New error Mitaka together with ODL-Beryllium

2016-08-19 Thread Rui Zang
lugins.ml2.managers [req-f228e4bb-0808-42b5-9628-0b2cd9ad1c92 - - - - -] Failed to bind port fcb2ecbe-07ba-41a1-8c5e-7dac6577d58b on host node-3.domain.tld for vnic_type normal using segments [{'segmentation_id': None, 'physical_network': u'physnet1', 'id':

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][networking-odl] New error Mitaka together with ODL-Beryllium

2016-08-19 Thread Nikolas Hermanns
de-3.domain.tld for vnic_type normal using segments [{'segmentation_id': None, 'physical_network': u'physnet1', 'id': u'9c2c66a2-557c-4547-912a-1f043ea76d9f', 'network_type': u'flat'}] 2016-08-19 07:29:30.644 23329 INFO ne

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][networking-odl] New error Mitaka together with ODL-Beryllium

2016-08-18 Thread Rui Zang
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][networking-odl] New error Mitaka together with ODL-Beryllium Hi Nikolas, First of all, neutron-...@lists.opendaylight.org (copied) might be a better place to ask networking-odl questions. It seems that the external network you described is not managed by

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][networking-odl] New error Mitaka together with ODL-Beryllium

2016-08-18 Thread Nikolas Hermanns
il.com] > Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 9:23 AM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Cc: Vishal Thapar; Nikolas Hermanns; Michal Skalski; neutron- > d...@lists.opendaylight.org > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][networking-odl] New error Mitak

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][networking-odl] New error Mitaka together with ODL-Beryllium

2016-08-18 Thread Rui Zang
Hi Nikolas, First of all, neutron-...@lists.opendaylight.org (copied) might be a better place to ask networking-odl questions. It seems that the external network you described is not managed by OpenDaylight, so it failed port binding. You probably want to configure multiple mechanism driver

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][networking-odl] New error Mitaka together with ODL-Beryllium

2016-08-17 Thread Nikolas Hermanns
Hey Networking-ODL folks, I just setup a Mirantis 9.0 release together with Opendaylight Beryllium. Using networking-odl v2 I see constantly the error: 2016-08-17 11:28:07.927 4040 ERROR neutron.plugins.ml2.managers [req-7e834676-81b4-479b-ad45-fa39f0fabed3 - - - - -] Failed to bind port faeaa4