Hello,
Thx for clarifications and closing this bug.
--
Best regards / Pozdrawiam
Sławek Kapłoński
sla...@kaplonski.pl
On Thu, 17 Nov 2016, Akihiro Motoki wrote:
> I totally agree with the direction of OSC and shade.
> The similar discussion happens in neutronclient side before too.
>
> From u
I totally agree with the direction of OSC and shade.
The similar discussion happens in neutronclient side before too.
>From user perspective, 'name' is really useful to identify resources,
even though admin usually use ID to identify resources.
In the past neutronclient discussion, requiring at le
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:55 AM, Sławek Kapłoński wrote:
> Thx all of You for explanations. So I think that [1] can be closed as
> "Won't fix" now. Am I right?
>
> [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1640767
Maybe? Doug, Monty and I are talking about OpenStackClient and Shade,
not neutro
Hello,
Thx all of You for explanations. So I think that [1] can be closed as
"Won't fix" now. Am I right?
[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1640767
--
Best regards / Pozdrawiam
Sławek Kapłoński
sla...@kaplonski.pl
On Wed, 16 Nov 2016, Dean Troyer wrote:
> > Excerpts from Sławek Kapł
> Excerpts from Sławek Kapłoński's message of 2016-11-16 22:36:41 +0100:
>> Hello,
>> So I want to ask all of You how in Your opinion it should be solved.
>> Currently there is inconsistency between CLI clients and
>> API/Horizon/Openstack SDK (I checked that it is possible to create
>> resource wi
On 11/16/2016 04:03 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> Excerpts from Sławek Kapłoński's message of 2016-11-16 22:36:41 +0100:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Few days ago someone reported bug [1] and I started checking it. I found
>> that when I'm trying to create QoS policy with neutronclient or OSC then
>> name paramete
Excerpts from Sławek Kapłoński's message of 2016-11-16 22:36:41 +0100:
> Hello,
>
> Few days ago someone reported bug [1] and I started checking it. I found
> that when I'm trying to create QoS policy with neutronclient or OSC then
> name parameter is neccessary.
> But this parameter is not necces