Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [QoS] QoS weekly meeting

Ok, during today’s preliminary meeting we talked about moving to #openstack-meeting-3, and we’re open to move -30m the meeting if it’s ok for everybody, to only partly overlap with the TWG, yet we could stay at 14:00 UTC for now. I have updated both wikis to reflect the meeting room change (to

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [QoS] QoS weekly meeting

On Apr 15, 2015, at 10:00 , Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo wrote: > > Ok, > > 1) #openstack-meeting-2 doesn’t exist (-alt is it) > > 2) and not only that we’re colliding the TWG meeting, > but all the meeting rooms starting at UTC 14:30 are busy. While not preferable, I don’t mind overlapping th

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [QoS] QoS weekly meeting

t; >>> >>>> On 9/4/2015, at 22:43, Howard, Victor >>> <mailto:victor_how...@cable.comcast.com>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I prefer Timeslot B, thanks for coordinating. I would be interested in >>>> helping out in any way with the des

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [QoS] QoS weekly meeting

stack.org>> Date: Tuesday, April 7, 2015 12:19 PM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [QoS] QoS weekly meeting Hi Miguel, Both time slots work for me. Thanks for rekin

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [QoS] QoS weekly meeting

gt;> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" >> > <mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> >> Date: Tuesday, April 7, 2015 12:19 PM >> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" >&g

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [QoS] QoS weekly meeting

19 PM > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" < > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [QoS] QoS weekly meeting > > Hi Miguel, > Both time slots work for me. Thanks for rekindling this effort.

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [QoS] QoS weekly meeting

ent Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [QoS] QoS weekly meeting > > Hi Miguel, > Both time slots work for me. Thanks for rekindling this effort. > > Thanks, > Sandhya > &

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [QoS] QoS weekly meeting

uot; mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Tuesday, April 7, 2015 12:19 PM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [QoS] QoS weekly meeting Hi Miguel, Both time slot

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [QoS] QoS weekly meeting

Hi Muguel: Either works for me. Carol From: Vikram Choudhary [mailto:vikram.choudh...@huawei.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2015 1:49 AM To: Miguel Ángel Ajo Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [QoS] QoS weekly meeting Hi

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [QoS] QoS weekly meeting

Hi Miguel, Voting for timeslot: b. Thanks Vikram From: Sandhya Dasu (sadasu) [mailto:sad...@cisco.com] Sent: 07 April 2015 21:49 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [QoS] QoS weekly meeting Hi Miguel, Both time slots work

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [QoS] QoS weekly meeting

esday, April 7, 2015 1:45 AM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [QoS] QoS weekly meeting On Tuesday, 7 de April de 2015 at 3:14, Kyle Mestery wrote: On Mon, Apr

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [QoS] QoS weekly meeting

On Apr 7, 2015, at 11:05 , Veiga, Anthony mailto:anthony_ve...@cable.comcast.com>> wrote: On Apr 7, 2015, at 10:50 , Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo mailto:majop...@redhat.com>> wrote: Hi Anthony, nice to hear about it! :) Is the implementation available somewhere?, Yes, it’s been posted on github[

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [QoS] QoS weekly meeting

On Apr 7, 2015, at 10:50 , Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo mailto:majop...@redhat.com>> wrote: Hi Anthony, nice to hear about it! :) Is the implementation available somewhere?, Yes, it’s been posted on github[1]. IMHO, the design should be what’s best for the whole neutron project looking into futur

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [QoS] QoS weekly meeting

Hi Anthony, nice to hear about it! :) Is the implementation available somewhere?, IMHO, the design should be what’s best for the whole neutron project looking into future extension of the design, by this I mean that we should not influence the design by what was already designed D/S, *but*,

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [QoS] QoS weekly meeting

Hi Raghunath, feel free to look at: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings and suggest other timeslots with a free meeting room, this is a very wide community, and it’s impossible to get a timeslot in everybody working hours. Please note that option

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [QoS] QoS weekly meeting

On Apr 6, 2015, at 11:56 , Miguel Ángel Ajo mailto:majop...@redhat.com>> wrote: I’d like to co-organized a QoS weekly meeting with Sean M. Collins, In the last few years, the interest for QoS support has increased, Sean has been leading this effort [1] and we believe we should get into a c

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [QoS] QoS weekly meeting

Hi  Miguel, I am interested to join this meeting. I assume that CC of this mail are from different time zones.Please provide time slot with common time zone. With Best Regards Raghunath Dudyala Tata Consultancy Services Limited Mailto: raghunat...@tcs.com Website: http://www.tcs.com _

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [QoS] QoS weekly meeting

Hi Miguel, Thank you for leading this. On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 8:45 AM, Miguel Ángel Ajo wrote: > On Tuesday, 7 de April de 2015 at 3:14, Kyle Mestery wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Salvatore Orlando > wrote: > > > > On 7 April 2015 at 00:33, Armando M. wrote: > > > On 6 April 2015

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [QoS] QoS weekly meeting

> On Apr 6, 2015, at 10:45 PM, Miguel Ángel Ajo wrote: > > On Tuesday, 7 de April de 2015 at 3:14, Kyle Mestery wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Salvatore Orlando > > wrote: >> >> >> On 7 April 2015 at 00:33, Armando M. > > wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [QoS] QoS weekly meeting

On Tuesday, 7 de April de 2015 at 3:14, Kyle Mestery wrote: > On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Salvatore Orlando (mailto:sorla...@nicira.com)> wrote: > > > > > > On 7 April 2015 at 00:33, Armando M. > (mailto:arma...@gmail.com)> wrote: > > > > > > On 6 April 2015 at 08:56, Miguel Ángel Ajo

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [QoS] QoS weekly meeting

On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Salvatore Orlando wrote: > > > On 7 April 2015 at 00:33, Armando M. wrote: > >> >> On 6 April 2015 at 08:56, Miguel Ángel Ajo wrote: >> >>> I’d like to co-organized a QoS weekly meeting with Sean M. Collins, >>> >>> In the last few years, the interest for Qo

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [QoS] QoS weekly meeting

On 7 April 2015 at 00:33, Armando M. wrote: > > On 6 April 2015 at 08:56, Miguel Ángel Ajo wrote: > >> I’d like to co-organized a QoS weekly meeting with Sean M. Collins, >> >> In the last few years, the interest for QoS support has increased, >> Sean has been leading >> this effort [1] and

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [QoS] QoS weekly meeting

On 6 April 2015 at 08:56, Miguel Ángel Ajo wrote: > I’d like to co-organized a QoS weekly meeting with Sean M. Collins, > > In the last few years, the interest for QoS support has increased, > Sean has been leading > this effort [1] and we believe we should get into a consensus about how to

[openstack-dev] [neutron] [QoS] QoS weekly meeting

I’d like to co-organized a QoS weekly meeting with Sean M. Collins, In the last few years, the interest for QoS support has increased, Sean has been leading this effort [1] and we believe we should get into a consensus about how to model an extension to let vendor plugins implement QoS capab