k.org>>
Date: Wednesday, November 9, 2016 at 11:43 PM
To: OpenStack List
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [lbaas] [octavia] Ocata LBaaS
retrospective and next steps recap
The people working on the migration are ensuring API compatibility and are
t this and I feel that it will cause
> production problems.
>
>
>
> From: Kevin Benton
> Reply-To: OpenStack List
> Date: Wednesday, November 9, 2016 at 11:43 PM
> To: OpenStack List
>
>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [lbaas] [octavia] Ocata LBa
: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [lbaas] [octavia] Ocata LBaaS
retrospective and next steps recap
The people working on the migration are ensuring API compatibility and are even
leaving in a shim on the Neutron side for some time so you don't even have to
change endpoints initially. It should be a sea
..@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2016 8:05 AM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [lbaas] [octavia] Ocata LBaaS
> retrospective and next steps recap
>
>
>
> On 9 November 2016 at 05:50, Gary K
y, November 09, 2016 8:05 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [lbaas] [octavia] Ocata LBaaS
retrospective and next steps recap
On 9 November 2016 at 05:50, Gary Kotton
mailto:gkot...@vmware.com>> wrote:
Hi,
What ab
8:05 AM
> *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [lbaas] [octavia] Ocata LBaaS
> retrospective and next steps recap
>
>
>
> On 9 November 2016 at 05:50, Gary Kotton wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> What about
iling List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [lbaas] [octavia] Ocata LBaaS
retrospective and next steps recap
On 9 November 2016 at 05:50, Gary Kotton
mailto:gkot...@vmware.com>> wrote:
Hi,
What about neutron-lbaas project? Is this project still alive and k
Hi Gary,
Our intent is to merge neutron-lbaas into the Octavia project. When
this is complete, the neutron-lbaas project will remain for some time
as a light weight shim/proxy that provides the legacy neutron endpoint
experience.
The database models are already very similar to the existing
neutr
On 9 November 2016 at 05:50, Gary Kotton wrote:
> Hi,
> What about neutron-lbaas project? Is this project still alive and kicking
> to the merge is done or are we going to continue to maintain it? I feel
> like we are between a rock and a hard place here. LBaaS is in production
> and it is not cl
Hi,
What about neutron-lbaas project? Is this project still alive and kicking to
the merge is done or are we going to continue to maintain it? I feel like we
are between a rock and a hard place here. LBaaS is in production and it is not
clear the migration process. Will Octavia have the same DB
thanks very much for the update!
Cheers,
Lingxian Kong (Larry)
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 12:36 PM, Michael Johnson
wrote:
> Ocata LBaaS retrospective and next steps recap
> --
>
> This session lightly touched on the work in the n
Ocata LBaaS retrospective and next steps recap
--
This session lightly touched on the work in the newton cycle, but
primarily focused on planning for the Ocata release and the LBaaS spin
out of neutron and merge into the octavia p
12 matches
Mail list logo