?
/Erik
From: Wuhongning [mailto:wuhongn...@huawei.com]
Sent: den 4 november 2014 03:41
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [nfv] VM-based VLAN trunking blueprints
Is the trunk port use case like the super vlan?
Also there is another
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tenant_vlans
/Erik
From: Erik Moe [mailto:erik@ericsson.com<mailto:erik@ericsson.com>]
Sent: den 2 november 2014 23:12
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [nfv] VM-based VLAN trunking blueprints
ards,
Keshava
From: Erik Moe [mailto:erik@ericsson.com]
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2014 3:42 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [nfv] VM-based VLAN trunking blueprints
From: Ian Wells [mailto:ijw.ubu...@cack.org.uk]
Sent: de
k Moe [erik@ericsson.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2014 5:36 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [nfv] VM-based VLAN trunking blueprints
I created an etherpad and added use cases (so far just the ones in your email).
t;
>
> /Erik
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Erik Moe [mailto:erik@ericsson.com]
> *Sent:* den 2 november 2014 23:12
>
> *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [nfv] VM-based VLAN trunking
> bluepr
: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [nfv] VM-based VLAN trunking blueprints
From: Ian Wells [mailto:ijw.ubu...@cack.org.uk]
Sent: den 31 oktober 2014 23:35
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [nfv] VM-based VLAN trunking blueprints
On 31
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2014 2:16 PM
To: Ian Wells; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Cc: A, Keshava
Subject: RE: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [nfv] VM-based VLAN trunking blueprints
Hi Ian,
I think we need to understand how these VRRP and HSRP will work and where it
used.
& regards,
Keshava
From: Ian Wells [mailto:ijw.ubu...@cack.org.uk]
Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2014 4:07 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [nfv] VM-based VLAN trunking blueprints
Go read about HSRP and VRRP. What you propos
ject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [nfv] VM-based VLAN trunking blueprints
>
>
> On 31 October 2014 06:29, Erik Moe wrote:
>
>
> I thought Monday network meeting agreed on that “VLAN aware VMs”, Trunk
> network + L2GW were different use cases.
>
> Still I get the
From: Ian Wells [mailto:ijw.ubu...@cack.org.uk]
Sent: den 31 oktober 2014 23:35
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [nfv] VM-based VLAN trunking blueprints
On 31 October 2014 06:29, Erik Moe
mailto:erik@ericsson.com
nothing from
doing active-standby port mgmt. in ovs.
/Alan
From: Ian Wells [mailto:ijw.ubu...@cack.org.uk]
Sent: October-31-14 11:37 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [nfv] VM-based VLAN trunking blueprints
Go read about HSRP
To address a point or two that Armando has raised here that weren't covered
in my other mail:
On 28 October 2014 11:00, Armando M. wrote:
> - Core Neutron changes: what needs to happen to the core of Neutron, if
> anything, so that we can implement this NFV-enabling constructs
> successfully? Ar
anding at packet level). *
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks & regards,
>
> Keshava
>
>
>
> *From:* Alan Kavanagh [mailto:alan.kavan...@ericsson.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 28, 2014 6:48 PM
>
> *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for
On 31 October 2014 06:29, Erik Moe wrote:
>
>
>
>
> I thought Monday network meeting agreed on that “VLAN aware VMs”, Trunk
> network + L2GW were different use cases.
>
>
>
> Still I get the feeling that the proposals are put up against each other.
>
I think we agreed they were different, or at
method depending on what is needed.
Thanks,
Erik
From: Armando M. [mailto:arma...@gmail.com]
Sent: den 28 oktober 2014 19:01
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [nfv] VM-based VLAN trunking blueprints
Sorry for jumping into
Sorry for jumping into this thread late...there's lots of details to
process, and I needed time to digest!
Having said that, I'd like to recap before moving the discussion forward,
at the Summit and beyond.
As it's being pointed out, there are a few efforts targeting this area; I
think that is se
Hi Salvatore
Inline below.
From: Salvatore Orlando [mailto:sorla...@nicira.com]
Sent: October-28-14 12:37 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [nfv] VM-based VLAN trunking blueprints
Keshava,
I think the thread is not going
*
>
>
>
> *From:* Ian Wells [mailto:ijw.ubu...@cack.org.uk ]
>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 28, 2014 1:11 PM
> *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [nfv] VM-based VLAN trunking
> blueprints
>
>
Hi,
Pl find my reply ..
Regards,
keshava
From: Alan Kavanagh [mailto:alan.kavan...@ericsson.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 3:35 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [nfv] VM-based VLAN trunking blueprints
Hi
Please
Hi
Please find some additions to Ian and responses below.
/Alan
From: A, Keshava [mailto:keshav...@hp.com]
Sent: October-28-14 9:57 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [nfv] VM-based VLAN trunking blueprints
Hi,
Pl fine the
Hi,
Pl fine the reply for the same.
Regards,
keshava
From: Ian Wells [mailto:ijw.ubu...@cack.org.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 1:11 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [nfv] VM-based VLAN trunking blueprints
This all
Ian Wells [mailto:ijw.ubu...@cack.org.uk]
> *Sent:* Monday, October 27, 2014 9:45 PM
> *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [nfv] VM-based VLAN trunking
> blueprints
>
>
>
> On 25 October 2014 15:36, Er
M
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [nfv] VM-based VLAN trunking blueprints
On 25 October 2014 15:36, Erik Moe
mailto:erik@ericsson.com>> wrote:
Then I tried to just use the trunk network as a plain pipe to the L2-gateway
and
On 25 October 2014 15:36, Erik Moe wrote:
> Then I tried to just use the trunk network as a plain pipe to the
> L2-gateway and connect to normal Neutron networks. One issue is that the
> L2-gateway will bridge the networks, but the services in the network you
> bridge to is unaware of your exist
ilto:bmela...@cisco.com]
Sent: den 24 oktober 2014 20:13
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [nfv] VM-based VLAN trunking blueprints
What scares me a bit about the "let's find a common solution for both external
devices
ck Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [nfv] VM-based VLAN trunking blueprints
There are two categories of problems:
1. some networks don't pass VLAN tagged traffic, and it's imp
5:01 PM
>> To: Steve Gordon; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
>> questions)
>> Cc: iawe...@cisco.com
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [nfv] VM-based VLAN trunking
>> blueprints
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Great that we
priority, its most welcome.
> /Alan
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Erik Moe [mailto:erik@ericsson.com]
> Sent: October-22-14 5:01 PM
> To: Steve Gordon; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
> questions)
> Cc: iawe...@cisco.com
> Subject: Re: [ope
: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [nfv] VM-based VLAN trunking blueprints
Hi,
Great that we can have more focus on this. I'll attend the meeting on Monday
and also attend the summit, looking forward to these discussions.
Thanks,
Erik
-Original Message-
From: Steve Gordon [mailto
I suppose this BP also has some relevance to such a discussion.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/100278/
/ Bob
On 2014-10-22 15:42, "Kyle Mestery" wrote:
>There are currently at least two BPs registered for VLAN trunk support
>to VMs in neutron-specs [1] [2]. This is clearly something that I'
pment Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Cc: Erik Moe; iawe...@cisco.com; calum.lou...@metaswitch.com
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [nfv] VM-based VLAN trunking blueprints
- Original Message -
> From: "Kyle Mestery"
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing Lis
- Original Message -
> From: "Kyle Mestery"
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>
>
> There are currently at least two BPs registered for VLAN trunk support
> to VMs in neutron-specs [1] [2]. This is clearly something that I'd
> like to see us land in Ki
Kyle,
I pointed out the similarity of the two specifications while reviewing them
a few months ago (see patch set #4).
Ian then approached me on IRC (I'm afraid it's going to be a bit difficult
to retrieve those logs), and pointed out that actually the two
specifications, in his opinion, try to ad
There are currently at least two BPs registered for VLAN trunk support
to VMs in neutron-specs [1] [2]. This is clearly something that I'd
like to see us land in Kilo, as it enables a bunch of things for the
NFV use cases. I'm going to propose that we talk about this at an
upcoming Neutron meeting
34 matches
Mail list logo
