Is TOR based vxlan really a common interest to most of the people, and
should a BP be taken care now with its designed use case of 3rd TOR backend
integration?
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 10:54 PM, Robert Kukura
wrote:
> Kyle,
>
> Please consider an FFE for https://blueprints.launchpad.
> net/neutro
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Robert Kukura wrote:
> Kyle,
>
> Please consider an FFE for
> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/ml2-hierarchical-port-binding.
> This was discussed extensively at Wednesday's ML2 meeting, where the
> consensus was that it would be valuable to get this i
Kyle,
Please consider an FFE for
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/ml2-hierarchical-port-binding.
This was discussed extensively at Wednesday's ML2 meeting, where the
consensus was that it would be valuable to get this into Juno if
possible. The patches have had core reviews from
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 3:38 AM, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo
wrote:
>
> I didn't know that we could ask for FFE, so I'd like to ask (if
> yet in time) for:
>
> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/agent-child-processes-status
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/
I didn't know that we could ask for FFE, so I'd like to ask (if
yet in time) for:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/agent-child-processes-status
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/neutron+branch:master+topic:bp/agent-child-processes-status,n,z
To get th
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Mark McClain wrote:
>
> On Sep 3, 2014, at 11:04 AM, Brian Haley wrote:
>
>> On 09/03/2014 08:17 AM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
>>> Given how deep the merge queue is (146 currently), we've effectively
>>> reached feature freeze in Neutron now (likely other projects as we
On Sep 3, 2014, at 11:04 AM, Brian Haley wrote:
> On 09/03/2014 08:17 AM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
>> Given how deep the merge queue is (146 currently), we've effectively
>> reached feature freeze in Neutron now (likely other projects as well).
>> So this morning I'm going to go through and remove BP
On 09/03/2014 08:17 AM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
> Given how deep the merge queue is (146 currently), we've effectively
> reached feature freeze in Neutron now (likely other projects as well).
> So this morning I'm going to go through and remove BPs from Juno which
> did not make the merge window. I'll
Given how deep the merge queue is (146 currently), we've effectively
reached feature freeze in Neutron now (likely other projects as well).
So this morning I'm going to go through and remove BPs from Juno which
did not make the merge window. I'll also be putting temporary -2s in
the patches to ensu
