mail.com>]
Sent: 13 May 2017 3:13
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] multi-site forum discussion
On 12 May 2017 at 11:47, Morales, Victor
<victor.mora...@intel.com<mailto:victor.mora...@intel.com>> wrote:
Arma
List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] multi-site forum discussion
On 12 May 2017 at 11:47, Morales, Victor
<victor.mora...@intel.com<mailto:victor.mora...@intel.com>> wrote:
Armando,
I noticed that Tricircle is mentioned there. Shouldn’t be better t
.com>
> *Reply-To: *"OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
> questions)" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> *Date: *Friday, May 12, 2017 at 1:06 PM
> *To: *"OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
> o
t for usage questions)"
<openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
Date: Friday, May 12, 2017 at 1:06 PM
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
<openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
Subject: [openstack-dev] [neutron] multi-site forum discussion
Hi
Hi folks,
At the summit we had a discussion on how to deploy a single neutron system
across multiple geographical sites [1]. You can find notes of the
discussion on [2].
One key requirement that came from the discussion was to make Neutron more
Nova cells friendly. I filed an RFE bug [3] so that
