On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 3:27 PM, David Kranz dkr...@redhat.com wrote:
On 05/13/2015 09:06 AM, Simon Pasquier wrote:
Hello,
Like many others commented before, I don't quite understand how unique are
the Cloudpulse use cases.
For operators, I got the feeling that existing solutions fit
On 05/13/2015 09:06 AM, Simon Pasquier wrote:
Hello,
Like many others commented before, I don't quite understand how unique
are the Cloudpulse use cases.
For operators, I got the feeling that existing solutions fit well:
- Traditional monitoring tools (Nagios, Zabbix, ) are necessary
(not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [new][cloudpulse] Announcing a project to
HealthCheck OpenStack deployments
On 05/13/2015 09:06 AM, Simon Pasquier wrote:
Hello,
Like many others commented before, I don't quite
On 5/12/15, 1:28 PM, Julien Danjou jul...@danjou.info wrote:
On Tue, May 12 2015, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
This is a great idea that would make a solid extension to the software.
If I read the wiki page correctly, the real goal is for operators and
tenants to be able to be notified via
On 13 May 2015 at 10:30, Vinod Pandarinathan (vpandari) vpand...@cisco.com
wrote:
- Traditional monitoring tools (Nagios, Zabbix, ) are necessary anyway
for infrastructure monitoring (CPU, RAM, disks, operating system, RabbitMQ,
databases and more) and diagnostic purposes. Adding OpenStack
Mooney, Sean K wrote:
Will cloudpulse be under the governance of the OpenStack Telemetry program
Or will this be an independent StackFoge repository?
I think there would be great value in having cloud monitoring or monitoring
as a service
In the telemetry program.
Except we don't do
: Steven Dake (stdake) [mailto:std...@cisco.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2015 3:39 PM
To: Julien Danjou
Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [new][cloudpulse] Announcing a project to
HealthCheck OpenStack deployments
On 5/12/15, 1:28 PM
On 05/13/2015 09:51 AM, Simon Pasquier wrote:
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 3:27 PM, David Kranz dkr...@redhat.com
mailto:dkr...@redhat.com wrote:
On 05/13/2015 09:06 AM, Simon Pasquier wrote:
Hello,
Like many others commented before, I don't quite understand how
unique are the
On 5/12/15, 2:43 PM, Richard Raseley rich...@raseley.com wrote:
On 05/12/2015 01:20 PM, Vinod Pandarinathan (vpandari) wrote:
Hello,
I'm pleased to announce the development of a new project called
CloudPulse. CloudPulse provides Openstack health-checking services
to both operators,
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [new][cloudpulse] Announcing a project to
HealthCheck OpenStack deployments
Hooking it into Zaqar would be awesome too. Once you can trigger Mistral
workflows based on Zaqar messages, just imagine the possibilities...
Kevin
From
13, 2015 at 6:06 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [new][cloudpulse] Announcing a project to
HealthCheck OpenStack deployments
Hello,
Like many others commented
How is the different/same as Monasca?
Regards.
--
Deklan Dieterly
Hewlett-Packard Company
Sr. Systems Software Engineer
HP Cloud
On 5/12/15, 11:48 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
For operators:
* Nagios
* Icinga
* Zabbix
installed on baremetal machines deployed with the OpenStack
Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com writes:
On 05/12/2015 02:16 PM, Fox, Kevin M wrote:
Nagios/watever As A Service would actually be very useful I think.
Frankly, so do tenants. Tenants install software on their images using
configuration management tools like mentioned above... I don't see a
Hello,
I'm pleased to announce the development of a new project called CloudPulse.
CloudPulse provides Openstack
health-checking services to both operators, tenants, and applications. This
project will begin as
a StackForge project based upon an empty cookiecutter[1] repo. The repos to
[jaypi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2015 10:48 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [new][cloudpulse] Announcing a project to
HealthCheck OpenStack deployments
For operators:
* Nagios
* Icinga
* Zabbix
installed on baremetal machines deployed
For operators:
* Nagios
* Icinga
* Zabbix
installed on baremetal machines deployed with the OpenStack and other
infrastructure services.
For tenants:
* Nagios
* Icinga
* Zabbix
installed on their VMs.
Why are we re-inventing excellent open-source implementations of
monitoring systems
On 05/12/15 20:48, Jay Pipes wrote:
For operators:
* Nagios
* Icinga
* Zabbix
installed on baremetal machines deployed with the OpenStack and other
infrastructure services.
For tenants:
* Nagios
* Icinga
* Zabbix
installed on their VMs.
Why are we re-inventing excellent open-source
To:
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev]
[new][cloudpulse] Announcing a project to HealthCheck OpenStack
deployments
For operators:
* Nagios * Icinga * Zabbix
installed on baremetal machines deployed with the OpenStack and
other infrastructure services.
For tenants
Very True. However the way I see these are extensions/plugins to
cloudpulse framework, so when these are available, the data from these
tools are exposed.
Openstack health service provides an overall framework with out
assumptions on what is installed on the underlying cloud.
The service is
On 05/12/2015 02:24 PM, Vinod Pandarinathan (vpandari) wrote:
Very True. However the way I see these are extensions/plugins to
cloudpulse framework, so when these are available, the data from these
tools are exposed.
Openstack health service provides an overall framework with out
assumptions
(not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [new][cloudpulse] Announcing a project to
HealthCheck OpenStack deployments
Kevin,
This is a great idea that would make a solid extension to the software.
If I read the wiki page correctly, the real goal is for operators and
tenants to be able
From: Jay Pipes [jaypi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2015 10:48 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [new][cloudpulse] Announcing a project to
HealthCheck OpenStack deployments
For operators:
* Nagios
* Icinga
* Zabbix
installed
On 05/12/2015 01:20 PM, Vinod Pandarinathan (vpandari) wrote:
Hello,
I'm pleased to announce the development of a new project called
CloudPulse. CloudPulse provides Openstack health-checking services
to both operators, tenants, and applications. This project will
begin as a StackForge project
On Tue, May 12 2015, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
This is a great idea that would make a solid extension to the software.
If I read the wiki page correctly, the real goal is for operators and
tenants to be able to be notified via querying the ReST API so they could
write their own
Thanks,
Kevin
From: Jay Pipes [jaypi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2015 12:50 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [new][cloudpulse] Announcing a project to
HealthCheck OpenStack deployments
On 05/12/2015 02:16 PM
12, 2015 12:50 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [new][cloudpulse] Announcing a project to
HealthCheck OpenStack deployments
On 05/12/2015 02:16 PM, Fox, Kevin M wrote:
Nagios/watever As A Service would actually be very useful I think.
I don't really
There are several differences:
1. Cloudpulse does not need any agent or special software installed on the
underlying cloud, the service can be installed on a tenant VM having
access to API network.
2. Cloudpulse can be configured for running specific test groups
periodically exercising core
From: Georgy Okrokvertskhov [gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2015 2:04 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [new][cloudpulse] Announcing a project to
HealthCheck OpenStack deployments
Here is the way how we do
Mailing List (not for usage questions)
*Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [new][cloudpulse] Announcing a project to
HealthCheck OpenStack deployments
Here is the way how we do VM level monitoring in application catalog.
There is an application Nagios which will deploy a Nagios VM to the user
On 05/12/2015 05:05 PM, Vinod Pandarinathan (vpandari) wrote:
There are several differences:
1. Cloudpulse does not need any agent or special software installed on the
underlying cloud, the service can be installed on a tenant VM having
access to API network.
2. Cloudpulse can be configured
30 matches
Mail list logo
