Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][bugs] Weekly Status Report

, Markus Zoeller (markus_z) Markus Zoeller/Germany/IBM@IBMDE wrote on 11/06/2015 05:54:59 PM: > From: Markus Zoeller/Germany/IBM@IBMDE > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Date: 11/06/2015 05:56 PM > Subject: [openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][bugs] Weekly Status Report

To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List \(not for usage questions\)" > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Date: 12/04/2015 03:35 PM > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][bugs] Weekly Status Report > > Below are the bug stats of the week "Mitaka R-18". >

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][bugs] Weekly Status Report

;openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Date: 11/20/2015 05:38 PM > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][bugs] Weekly Status Report > > Below are the bug stats of the week "Mitaka R-20". > Increases/decreases compared to "Mitaka R-21" are in parantheses. > T

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][bugs] Weekly Status Report

gt; > Date: 11/13/2015 04:09 PM > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][bugs] Weekly Status Report > > Below are the stats of the week "Mitaka R-21". > Changes to the previous week are shown in parantheses behind the current > numbers. For example, "28 (+9)" means we h

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][bugs] Weekly Status Report

05:54:59 PM: > From: Markus Zoeller/Germany/IBM@IBMDE > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Date: 11/06/2015 05:56 PM > Subject: [openstack-dev] [nova][bugs] Weekly Status Report > > Hey folks, > > below is

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][bugs] Weekly Status Report

On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Markus Zoeller wrote: > Regarding "non-bug" areas where you can contribute, there are also some > areas which called out explicitly for more help. I remember: > * the API team [1] and > * the notification/tasks area [2]. > Maybe it makes sense

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][bugs] Weekly Status Report

PM > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][bugs] Weekly Status Report > > On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 05:54:59PM +0100, Markus Zoeller wrote: > > Hey folks, > > > > below is the first report of bug stats I intend to post weekly. > > We discussed it shortly during the

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][bugs] Weekly Status Report

age questions)" > > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > > Date: 11/06/2015 06:37 PM > > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][bugs] Weekly Status Report > > > > On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 05:54:59PM +0100, Markus Zoeller wrote: > > > Hey folks, > > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][bugs] Weekly Status Report

5 09:54 PM > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][bugs] Weekly Status Report > > On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Markus Zoeller <mzoel...@de.ibm.com> wrote: > > below is the first report of bug stats I intend to post weekly. > > We discussed it shortly during the Mitak

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][bugs] Weekly Status Report

John Garbutt <j...@johngarbutt.com> wrote on 11/09/2015 11:10:55 AM: > From: John Garbutt <j...@johngarbutt.com> > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Date: 11/09/2015 11:11 AM &g

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][bugs] Weekly Status Report

Augustina Ragwitz <aragw...@pobox.com> wrote on 11/06/2015 10:39:17 PM: > From: Augustina Ragwitz <aragw...@pobox.com> > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Date: 11/06/2015 10:39 PM &g

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][bugs] Weekly Status Report

On 6 November 2015 at 21:39, Augustina Ragwitz wrote: > I totally second that on the low-hanging-fruit tag! And I'm happy to help > with some of the triaging. I'm still pretty new to Nova so I'm not sure how > helpful I'll be but it seems like a good task for getting to know

[openstack-dev] [nova][bugs] Weekly Status Report

Hey folks, below is the first report of bug stats I intend to post weekly. We discussed it shortly during the Mitaka summit that this report could be useful to keep the attention of the open bugs at a certain level. Let me know if you think it's missing something. Stats = New bugs which are

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][bugs] Weekly Status Report

On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 05:54:59PM +0100, Markus Zoeller wrote: > Hey folks, > > below is the first report of bug stats I intend to post weekly. > We discussed it shortly during the Mitaka summit that this report > could be useful to keep the attention of the open bugs at a certain > level. Let

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][bugs] Weekly Status Report

On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Markus Zoeller wrote: > below is the first report of bug stats I intend to post weekly. > We discussed it shortly during the Mitaka summit that this report > could be useful to keep the attention of the open bugs at a certain > level. Let me

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][bugs] Weekly Status Report

I totally second that on the low-hanging-fruit tag! And I'm happy to help with some of the triaging. I'm still pretty new to Nova so I'm not sure how helpful I'll be but it seems like a good task for getting to know more about things at least from a high level. Would bug triaging be a meta