...@huawei.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 3:36 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][ceilometer][gantt] Dynamic
scheduling
Hi,
We have checked that gantt now just made a synced up copy of the code
in nova.
We still
Hi,
We have checked that gantt now just made a synced up copy of the code in nova.
We still think dynamic scheduling will be a benefit of the nova scheduler (or
gantt later). The main difference between static and dynamic scheduling is that
static scheduling is a vm placement problem, while
3:36 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][ceilometer][gantt] Dynamic scheduling
Hi,
We have checked that gantt now just made a synced up copy of the code in nova.
We still think dynamic scheduling will be a benefit of the nova
]
*Sent:* Thursday, April 24, 2014 3:36 AM
*To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
*Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][ceilometer][gantt] Dynamic
scheduling
Hi,
We have checked that gantt now just made a synced up copy of the code in
nova.
We still think dynamic
)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][ceilometer][gantt] Dynamic scheduling
Donald,
By selection, I think Jenny means identifying whether and which active VM
should be migrated, once the current Nova scheduler only deals with the VM in
the momment of its creation or with a specific user input.
2014
: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][ceilometer][gantt] Dynamic scheduling
Hi,
We have checked that gantt now just made a synced up copy of the code in
nova.
We still think dynamic scheduling will be a benefit of the nova
scheduler (or gantt later). The main difference between static and dynamic
decisse. - D. Gale
Ph: 303/443-3786
From: Jiangying (Jenny) [mailto:jenny.jiangy...@huawei.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 3:36 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][ceilometer][gantt] Dynamic
scheduling
Hi
