On 09/15/2015 02:25 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
Taking a host offline for maintenance, should be considered
equivalent to throwing away the existing host and deploying a new
host. There should be zero state carry-over from OpenStack POV,
since both the software and hardware changes can potenti
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 09:34:31PM -0400, Jay Pipes wrote:
> On 09/10/2015 05:23 PM, Brent Eagles wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I was recently informed of a situation that came up when an engineer
> >added an SR-IOV nic to a compute node that was hosting some guests that
> >had VFs attached. Unfortunately,
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 06:53:06PM -0230, Brent Eagles wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was recently informed of a situation that came up when an engineer
> added an SR-IOV nic to a compute node that was hosting some guests that
> had VFs attached. Unfortunately, adding the card shuffled the PCI
> addresses cau
On 09/10/2015 05:23 PM, Brent Eagles wrote:
Hi,
I was recently informed of a situation that came up when an engineer
added an SR-IOV nic to a compute node that was hosting some guests that
had VFs attached. Unfortunately, adding the card shuffled the PCI
addresses causing some degree of havoc. B
Brent is our Neutron-Nova liaison - can someone from the SR-IOV team
please respond?
--
Sean M. Collins
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?s
Hi,
I was recently informed of a situation that came up when an engineer
added an SR-IOV nic to a compute node that was hosting some guests that
had VFs attached. Unfortunately, adding the card shuffled the PCI
addresses causing some degree of havoc. Basically, the PCI addresses
associated with th
