dev] [nova][neutron] PCI pass-through SRIOV on
> Jan. 29th
>
>
>
> On 29 January 2014 23:50, Robert Kukura <mailto:rkuk...@redhat.com>> wrote:
>
> On 01/29/2014 05:44 PM, Robert Li (baoli) wrote:
> > Hi Bob,
> >
> &
Please see inline
From: Ian Wells [mailto:ijw.ubu...@cack.org.uk]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 1:17 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][neutron] PCI pass-through SRIOV on Jan. 29th
On 29 January 2014 23:50, Robert Kukura
Hi Bob,
Those are all good questions. But as with nova VM flavor, could profileid
be created by the admin, and then used by normal users? For the Icehouse
release, we won't have time to develop the profileid management API. I
think that next release we should have it available. Personally, I don't
On 29 January 2014 23:50, Robert Kukura wrote:
> On 01/29/2014 05:44 PM, Robert Li (baoli) wrote:
> > Hi Bob,
> >
> > that's a good find. profileid as part of IEEE 802.1br needs to be in
> > binding:profile, and can be specified by a normal user, and later
> possibly
> > the pci_flavor. Would it
On 01/29/2014 05:44 PM, Robert Li (baoli) wrote:
> Hi Bob,
>
> that's a good find. profileid as part of IEEE 802.1br needs to be in
> binding:profile, and can be specified by a normal user, and later possibly
> the pci_flavor. Would it be wrong to say something as in below in the
> policy.json?
>
Hi Bob,
that's a good find. profileid as part of IEEE 802.1br needs to be in
binding:profile, and can be specified by a normal user, and later possibly
the pci_flavor. Would it be wrong to say something as in below in the
policy.json?
"create_port:binding:vnic_type": "rule:admin_or_network_owner"
day, January 29, 2014 6:03 PM
To: Irena Berezovsky; rkuk...@redhat.com<mailto:rkuk...@redhat.com>; Sandhya
Dasu (sadasu); OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][neutron] PCI pass-through SRIOV on Jan. 29th
Hi Irena,
I'm now eve
On 01/29/2014 09:46 AM, Robert Li (baoli) wrote:
> Another issue that came up during the meeting is about whether or not
> vnic-type should be part of the top level binding or part of
> binding:profile. In other words, should it be defined as
> binding:vnic-type or binding:profile:vnic-type.
I
t: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][neutron] PCI pass-through SRIOV on Jan. 29th
Hi Irena,
I'm now even more confused. I must have missed something. See inline
Thanks,
Robert
On 1/29/14 10:19 AM, "Irena Berezovsky"
mailto:ire...@mellanox.com>> wrote:
Hi Robert,
I thin
t: Wednesday, January 29, 2014 4:47 PM
To: Irena Berezovsky; rkuk...@redhat.com<mailto:rkuk...@redhat.com>; Sandhya
Dasu (sadasu); OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][neutron] PCI pass-through SRIOV on Jan. 29th
Hi folks,
I'
k-dev] [nova][neutron] PCI pass-through SRIOV on Jan. 29th
Hi folks,
I'd like to do a recap on today's meeting, and if possible we should continue
the discussion in this thread so that we can be more productive in tomorrow's
meeting.
Bob suggests that we have these BPs:
One generic c
Will attend
From: Robert Li (baoli) [mailto:ba...@cisco.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2014 12:55 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: [openstack-dev] [nova][neutron] PCI pass-through SRIOV on Jan. 29th
Hi Folks,
Can we have one more meeting tomorrow? I&#x
Hi Folks,
Can we have one more meeting tomorrow? I'd like to discuss the blueprints we
are going to have and what each BP will be covering.
thanks,
Robert
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-b
13 matches
Mail list logo
