From: Duncan Thomas
> On 18 May 2017 at 22:26, Rochelle Grober
> wrote:
> > If you're going to use --distance, then you should have specific values
> (standard definitions) rather than operator defined:
> > And for that matter, is there something better than distance? Collocated
> maybe?
> >
>
On 18 May 2017 at 22:26, Rochelle Grober wrote:
> If you're going to use --distance, then you should have specific values
> (standard definitions) rather than operator defined:
> And for that matter, is there something better than distance? Collocated
> maybe?
>
> colocated={local, rack, row, m
From: Matt Riedemann
> On 5/15/2017 2:28 PM, Edmund Rhudy (BLOOMBERG/ 120 PARK) wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'd like to follow up on a few discussions that took place last week
> > in Boston, specifically in the Compute Instance/Volume Affinity for
> > HPC session
> > (https://etherpad.openstack
On 5/15/2017 5:34 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 5/15/2017 5:23 PM, Eric Fried wrote:
How about aggregates?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fu6jdGGdYU4&feature=youtu.be&t=1784
Aggregates aren't exposed to the user directly, they are exposed to the
user via availability zones. Avoiding the explos
On 5/15/2017 5:23 PM, Eric Fried wrote:
How about aggregates?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fu6jdGGdYU4&feature=youtu.be&t=1784
Aggregates aren't exposed to the user directly, they are exposed to the
user via availability zones. Avoiding the explosion of 1:1 AZs is what
we want to avoid for
> If there are alternative ideas on how to design or model this, I'm all
> ears.
How about aggregates?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fu6jdGGdYU4&feature=youtu.be&t=1784
On 05/15/2017 05:04 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
> On 5/15/2017 2:28 PM, Edmund Rhudy (BLOOMBERG/ 120 PARK) wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
On 5/15/2017 2:28 PM, Edmund Rhudy (BLOOMBERG/ 120 PARK) wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to follow up on a few discussions that took place last week in
Boston, specifically in the Compute Instance/Volume Affinity for HPC
session
(https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/BOS-forum-compute-instance-volume-affinit
Hi all,
I'd like to follow up on a few discussions that took place last week in Boston,
specifically in the Compute Instance/Volume Affinity for HPC session
(https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/BOS-forum-compute-instance-volume-affinity-hpc).
In this session, the discussions all trended towards ad
