Thanks, Jay! We’re looking through everything and will be attending these
meetings moving forward.
-Travis
On 5/3/16, 6:17 AM, "Jay Pipes" wrote:
>cc'ing Travis and Steve directly, since they will likely be very
>interested in this effort from the Project Searchlight
> -Original Message-
> From: Ryan Rossiter [mailto:rlros...@linux.vnet.ibm.com]
> Sent: May 03, 2016 16:10
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Austin summit versioned notification
>
>
> >
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Riedemann [mailto:mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com]
> Sent: May 03, 2016 15:58
> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Austin summit versioned notification
>
> On 5/3/2016 3:10 AM, Balázs Gibizer wrote:
> On May 3, 2016, at 8:58 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
>
> On 5/3/2016 3:10 AM, Balázs Gibizer wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Last week Friday in Austin we discussed the way forward with the versioned
>> notification transformation in Nova.
>>
>> We agreed that when we separate
On 5/3/2016 3:10 AM, Balázs Gibizer wrote:
Hi,
Last week Friday in Austin we discussed the way forward with the versioned
notification transformation in Nova.
We agreed that when we separate the object model use for notifications from
the nova object model we still use the NovaObject as a base
cc'ing Travis and Steve directly, since they will likely be very
interested in this effort from the Project Searchlight perspective. :)
On 05/03/2016 04:10 AM, Balázs Gibizer wrote:
Hi,
Last week Friday in Austin we discussed the way forward with the versioned
notification transformation in
Hi,
Last week Friday in Austin we discussed the way forward with the versioned
notification transformation in Nova.
We agreed that when we separate the object model use for notifications from
the nova object model we still use the NovaObject as a base class to avoid
change in the wire format