On 2/7/17, 4:18 AM, "Markus Zoeller" wrote:
>On 03.02.2017 21:37, Szankin, Maciej wrote:
>> On 2/3/17 2:26 PM, Singh, Sarafraj wrote:
>>> Matt,
>>> This chart is quite accurate. We are almost finished with this work. We
>>> have ~10 outstanding patches that did
On 03.02.2017 21:37, Szankin, Maciej wrote:
> On 2/3/17 2:26 PM, Singh, Sarafraj wrote:
>> Matt,
>> This chart is quite accurate. We are almost finished with this work. We have
>> ~10 outstanding patches that did not land in Ocata. There are few more
>> TODO’s left in the code to clean up and
On 2/3/17 2:26 PM, Singh, Sarafraj wrote:
> Matt,
> This chart is quite accurate. We are almost finished with this work. We have
> ~10 outstanding patches that did not land in Ocata. There are few more TODO’s
> left in the code to clean up and that should be it.
>
> -Raj
>
> On 2/3/17, 2:08 PM,
Matt,
This chart is quite accurate. We are almost finished with this work. We have
~10 outstanding patches that did not land in Ocata. There are few more TODO’s
left in the code to clean up and that should be it.
-Raj
On 2/3/17, 2:08 PM, "Matt Riedemann" wrote:
This is sort of a direct question to Markus, but how accurate is this
burndown chart now?
http://45.55.105.55:8082/config-options.html
I think there is still work for this in Pike, but would like to get an
idea of how much of the work is left from those more involved (maybe
johnthetubaguy or