On 10/07/2015 07:02 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 06:55:44AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
>> On 10/07/2015 06:46 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>> In the Liberty version of OpenStack we had a min libvirt of 0.9.11 and
>>> printed a warning on startup if you had < 0.10.2, to
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 07:17:09AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 10/07/2015 07:02 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 06:55:44AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
> >> Isn't RHEL 7.1 just an update stream on RHEL 7.0? It seems a little
> >> weird to keep the 1.1.1 support instead of
In the Liberty version of OpenStack we had a min libvirt of 0.9.11 and
printed a warning on startup if you had < 0.10.2, to the effect that
Mitaka will required 0.10.2
This mail is a reminder that we will[1] mandate libvirt >= 0.10.2 when
Mitaka is released.
Looking forward to the N
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 06:55:44AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 10/07/2015 06:46 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > In the Liberty version of OpenStack we had a min libvirt of 0.9.11 and
> > printed a warning on startup if you had < 0.10.2, to the effect that
> > Mitaka will required 0.10.2
> >
>
On 10/07/2015 06:46 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> In the Liberty version of OpenStack we had a min libvirt of 0.9.11 and
> printed a warning on startup if you had < 0.10.2, to the effect that
> Mitaka will required 0.10.2
>
> This mail is a reminder that we will[1] mandate libvirt >= 0.10.2
